Draw on the tools of analysis that we have studied in class up to this point– “paths”
(Geisler), “Synthesis” (Charney), and “consensual knowledge” (Kaufer & Geisler)– to analyze one of the following texts, your data for this assignment. How does the writer attempt to shape our experience of controversy? Which tools of analysis best help explain the writer’s approach? In your paper, aim to draw an original conclusion based on your analysis and present
excerpts from the data as evidence. the essay will be to draw on evidence from the
articles I will upload which are about main paths, faulty paths and mapping conversations I
will upload and using the articles from “paths”
(Geisler), “Synthesis” (Charney), and “consensual knowledge” (Kaufer & Geisler) to analyze another article called “choice feminism which I will upload. Also I will upload notes about
main paths and faulty paths and mapping conversations which is what the essay is
about. There is a passage that I included that will need to be in the essay as well, which is a
problematic passage from the “choice feminism article” which is a faulty path which needs to be included in the essay as well.