Please write an essay that responds to the question below. This paper should be
approximately 6-7 pages, double-spaced and you should engage with at least three of the
thinkers
Should political dissent be “civil” to be considered democratic? Why or why not?
Use Gandhi, Martin Luther King. Jr., Malcolm X
Use this thesis: While civility can enhance the effectiveness of political dissent, it is not a prerequisite for democratic participation. This will be explored through the perspectives of Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X.
Don’t commit plagiarism, and if you use resources please cite properly in MLA format
Use this structure:
Introduction
- Briefly introduce the topic of political dissent in democratic societies.
- State the thesis: While civility can enhance the effectiveness of political dissent, it is not a prerequisite for democratic participation. This will be explored through the perspectives of Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X.
Section 1:
Gandhi and Nonviolent Resistance- Discuss Gandhi’s philosophy of “Satyagraha” or nonviolent resistance.
- Analyze how Gandhi’s approach exemplifies civil dissent, emphasizing respect for opponents and the rule of law.
- Discuss the impact of Gandhi’s approach on the Indian independence movement.
Section 2: Martin Luther King Jr. and Civil Disobedience
- Discuss King’s philosophy of civil disobedience, inspired by Gandhi’s approach.
- Analyze how King’s approach, while disruptive, maintained a commitment to civility and nonviolence.
- Discuss the role of King’s approach in advancing civil rights in the United States.
Section 3: Malcolm X and the Question of Civility
- Discuss Malcolm X’s philosophy, which critiqued the emphasis on nonviolence and civility.
- Analyze how Malcolm X’s approach challenges the notion that civility is a prerequisite for democratic dissent.
- Discuss the impact of Malcolm X’s approach on the civil rights movement and broader discussions about race in America.
Conclusion
- Summarize the main points of the essay.
- Reiterate the thesis and discuss its implications for understanding political dissent in democratic societies.