Case analysis questions (maximum word count 750 words). Explain the ICJ decision in Argentina v Uruguay. In your view, to what extent did Uruguay owe Argentina any reparations or remedial action for violating its treaty obligations?
Give background on the treaty and why argentina was taking Uruguay to the ICJ, then deailed the ICJ’s decision, and then state that the ICJ ruled fairly within the confines of the law but the law is lacking in accountability, highlighting they said uruguay was guilty for violating procedural clauses of the treaty but not substantive and then said they could keep the mills, basically tells nations that they can do what they want procedurally and as long as there’s no substantive impact, there’s no consequences internationally.
use the following reading if needed:
Argentina-Uruguay Pulp Mills Dispute
Justin Gillis, “The Montreal Protocol, a Little Treaty That Could,” New York Times, 2013
Ch 11. Protecting the International Environment. (Only Intro + Parts II and III, 603-605, 626-662).
Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!
How our paper writing service works
It's very simple!
-
Fill out the order form
Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.
-
Choose writer
Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.
-
Add funds
Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.
-
Ready
Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.