Your task is to utilize Chi Luu’s insights as a critical lens to delve into Scott’s discussion on the balance between freedom of speech and civility.

Prompt

In this essay, you are invited to embark on a critical exploration of two compelling readings: “The Sorry State of Apologies” by Chi Luu and “Freedom of Speech v. Civility” by Anne Wallach Scott. Your task is to utilize Chi Luu’s insights as a critical lens to delve into Scott’s discussion on the balance between freedom of speech and civility.

Your essay should address the following points:

1. The first paragraph: Provide an INTRODUCTION that introduces both readings and authors, please provide comprehensive background information on both readings that connects them to each other, and lastly create a POWERFUL thesis statement that begins with “I argue” to position your overall argument.

2. Comparative Analysis (Body Paragraph #1): Begin by presenting a succinct summary of the key arguments in both readings. Highlight how Luu’s perspective on apologies in modern society can be applied to understand Scott’s exploration of freedom of speech and civility.

3. Critical Lens Application (Body Paragraphs 2-3): Analyze how the concept of apologies, as discussed by Luu, intersects with the ideas of freedom of speech and civility in Scott’s work. Consider questions such as: How does the act of apologizing (or the lack thereof) influence the discourse on freedom of speech? In what ways do apologies play a role in maintaining or disrupting civility?

4. Societal Implications (Body Paragraphs 4): Reflect on the broader societal implications of merging these two perspectives. Discuss how understanding apologies can inform our approach to the balance between free speech and civility in contemporary society.

5. Personal Stance (Body Paragraph 5): Articulate your own position in this debate. Do you agree with the perspectives presented in the readings? How does your view align or contrast with the authors’ arguments?

6. Conclusion (last paragraph): Conclude by summarizing your key points and offering insights on the future implications of this discourse in the context of societal interactions and communication ethics. Restate your thesis in original language! 

Your essay should demonstrate critical thinking, clear argumentation, and thorough engagement with both readings. Use specific examples from the texts to support your analysis, and ensure your essay is structured coherently with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

Questions to Consider

1. Understanding Key Concepts:

   • How does Chi Luu define and contextualize the concept of apologies in “The Sorry State of Apologies”?
   • In “Freedom of Speech v. Civility” by Anne Wallach Scott, what are the key arguments presented about the balance between freedom of speech and civility?

2. Analyzing Intersections:

   • In what ways do the ideas about apologies in Luu’s work intersect with or contradict the notions of freedom of speech and civility discussed by Scott?
   • Can the act of apologizing be seen as a form of self-censorship or a necessary component of civil discourse?

3. Critical Lens Application:

   • How does using Luu’s perspective on apologies as a lens affect your understanding of Scott’s arguments about freedom of speech and civility?
   • Are there instances in Scott’s text where the concept of apologies might offer a deeper understanding or a different perspective?

4. Societal Implications and Examples:

   • Can you provide contemporary examples where the balance between apologies, freedom of speech, and civility has been prominent in public discourse?
   • How do these concepts play out in various social contexts, such as politics, social media, or personal relationships?

5. Reflecting on Personal and Societal Values:

   • How do your personal experiences and values shape your understanding of the balance between apologies, freedom of speech, and civility?
   • What role do you believe apologies should play in public discourse, especially in controversial or sensitive topics?

6. Future Implications:

   • What potential future challenges and developments can you foresee in the interplay between apologies, freedom of speech, and civility?
   • How might evolving societal norms and communication technologies influence this balance?

Formatting and Requirements

• Write your essay directly in Google or Word, and when finished copy and paste into Achieve. The final revision will be uploaded here and in Turn it in via Canvas. 

• Your essay should be approximately 4-5 pages in length (around 1100-1300 words)

• Include your name, my name, class and date in the upper left corner of the 1st page

• Format your essay according to MLA guidelines (see Documenting Sources: MLA Style in Achieve)

• Include a Works Cited page listing all sources you used or consulted

For Writing Assistance

• See me during office hours for help with specific questions regarding your essay

• Visit the FAU Writing Center for in-person or virtual writing assistance. http://www.fau.edu/UCEW/

Prompt

In this essay, you are invited to embark on a critical exploration of two compelling readings: “The Sorry State of Apologies” by Chi Luu and “Freedom of Speech v. Civility” by Anne Wallach Scott. Your task is to utilize Chi Luu’s insights as a critical lens to delve into Scott’s discussion on the balance between freedom of speech and civility.

Your essay should address the following points:

1. The first paragraph: Provide an INTRODUCTION that introduces both readings and authors, please provide comprehensive background information on both readings that connects them to each other, and lastly create a POWERFUL thesis statement that begins with “I argue” to position your overall argument.

2. Comparative Analysis (Body Paragraph #1): Begin by presenting a succinct summary of the key arguments in both readings. Highlight how Luu’s perspective on apologies in modern society can be applied to understand Scott’s exploration of freedom of speech and civility.

3. Critical Lens Application (Body Paragraphs 2-3): Analyze how the concept of apologies, as discussed by Luu, intersects with the ideas of freedom of speech and civility in Scott’s work. Consider questions such as: How does the act of apologizing (or the lack thereof) influence the discourse on freedom of speech? In what ways do apologies play a role in maintaining or disrupting civility?

4. Societal Implications (Body Paragraphs 4): Reflect on the broader societal implications of merging these two perspectives. Discuss how understanding apologies can inform our approach to the balance between free speech and civility in contemporary society.

5. Personal Stance (Body Paragraph 5): Articulate your own position in this debate. Do you agree with the perspectives presented in the readings? How does your view align or contrast with the authors’ arguments?

6. Conclusion (last paragraph): Conclude by summarizing your key points and offering insights on the future implications of this discourse in the context of societal interactions and communication ethics. Restate your thesis in original language! 

Your essay should demonstrate critical thinking, clear argumentation, and thorough engagement with both readings. Use specific examples from the texts to support your analysis, and ensure your essay is structured coherently with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

Questions to Consider

1. Understanding Key Concepts:

   • How does Chi Luu define and contextualize the concept of apologies in “The Sorry State of Apologies”?
   • In “Freedom of Speech v. Civility” by Anne Wallach Scott, what are the key arguments presented about the balance between freedom of speech and civility?

2. Analyzing Intersections:

   • In what ways do the ideas about apologies in Luu’s work intersect with or contradict the notions of freedom of speech and civility discussed by Scott?
   • Can the act of apologizing be seen as a form of self-censorship or a necessary component of civil discourse?

3. Critical Lens Application:

   • How does using Luu’s perspective on apologies as a lens affect your understanding of Scott’s arguments about freedom of speech and civility?
   • Are there instances in Scott’s text where the concept of apologies might offer a deeper understanding or a different perspective?

4. Societal Implications and Examples:

   • Can you provide contemporary examples where the balance between apologies, freedom of speech, and civility has been prominent in public discourse?
   • How do these concepts play out in various social contexts, such as politics, social media, or personal relationships?

5. Reflecting on Personal and Societal Values:

   • How do your personal experiences and values shape your understanding of the balance between apologies, freedom of speech, and civility?
   • What role do you believe apologies should play in public discourse, especially in controversial or sensitive topics?

6. Future Implications:

   • What potential future challenges and developments can you foresee in the interplay between apologies, freedom of speech, and civility?
   • How might evolving societal norms and communication technologies influence this balance?

Formatting and Requirements

• Write your essay directly in Google or Word, and when finished copy and paste into Achieve. The final revision will be uploaded here and in Turn it in via Canvas. 

• Your essay should be approximately 4-5 pages in length (around 1100-1300 words)

• Include your name, my name, class and date in the upper left corner of the 1st page

• Format your essay according to MLA guidelines (see Documenting Sources: MLA Style in Achieve)

• Include a Works Cited page listing all sources you used or consulted

For Writing Assistance

• See me during office hours for help with specific questions regarding your essay

• Visit the FAU Writing Center for in-person or virtual writing assistance. http://www.fau.edu/UCEW/