Detailed instructions:
1. General description: Use Ericson Anders book “Peak: How all of us can achieve extra ordinary things” to analyze the development of chess expertise in the Netflix
miniseries The Queen’s Gambit. Is the development of the heroine’s chess skills consistent with the
principles outlined in Anders Ericsson’s theories? Give some examples of where the theory fits and
where it does not. Provide a clear, straightforward explanation of the theory and concepts in your own
words. If you use any formal terminology, be sure to define it clearly.
2. Your analysis should primarily be drawn from the book Peak.
3. Illustrative example: Provide a detailed example from the miniseries that illustrate why the concept or
theory is relevant.
theory is relevant.
4. Conclusion: Provide a short summary of your main points and describe any strengths or limitations of
the concept or theory. For example, why is this concept or theory particularly useful in explaining a
certain event or experience, relative to others? Demonstrate your critical thinking skills.
the concept or theory. For example, why is this concept or theory particularly useful in explaining a
certain event or experience, relative to others? Demonstrate your critical thinking skills.
Use the theory of deliberate practise, mental rehearsal, and self motivation to how the miniseries align with Ericson’s views.
Use early/late exposure to the game and natural talent in the miniseries to show how the miniseries in a way deviate from Ericson’s theories.
Please be detailed, descriptive and clear