Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Then take the free personality test based on Carl Jung’s and Isabel Briggs Myers’ personality type theory. This test adds a few differences to personality assessment than what is mentioned in your textbook.
Here the first criterion, Extraversion – Introversion, signifies the source and direction of a person’s energy expression. An extravert’s source and direction of energy expression is mainly in the external world, while an introvert has a source of energy mainly in their own internal world.
The second criterion, Sensing – Intuition, represents the method by which someone perceives information. Sensing means that a person mainly believes information he or she receives directly from the external world. Intuition means that a person believes mainly information he or she receives from the internal or imaginative world.
The third criterion, Thinking – Feeling, represents how a person processes information. Thinking means that a person makes a decision mainly through logic. Feeling means that, as a rule, he or she makes a decision based on emotion, i.e. based on what they feel they should do.
The fourth criterion, Judging – Perceiving, reflects how a person implements the information he or she has processed. Judging means that a person organizes all of his life events and, as a rule, sticks to his plans. Perceiving means that he or she is inclined to improvise and explore alternative options.
All possible permutations of preferences in the 4 dichotomies above yield 16 different combinations, or personality types, representing which of the two poles in each of the four dichotomies dominates in a person, thus defining 16 different personality types. Each personality type can be assigned a 4 letter acronym of the corresponding combination of preferences:
After completing the tests, write a one- to two-page essay about your results. For the IPIP-BFFM, indicate the percentile for each factor. For example, if you received these scores:
You could write:
Factor I – Extroversion – 29%
Factor II – Emotional Stability – 96%
Factor III – Agreeableness – 82%
Factor IV – Conscientiousness – 95%
Factor V – Intellect/Imagination – 88%
For the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, begin with the acronym you were given and the percentages listed.
For this result:
I would write:
I am ENFJ. I have a slight preference for Extraversion over Introversion (19%). I have a slight preference for Intuition over Sensing (22%). I have a moderate preference for Feeling over Thinking (28%). And I have a moderate preference for Judging over Perceiving (28%).
Read the paragraphs following your result carefully and then discuss the following for this Myers-Briggs test result:
· For each of the four criteria, do you agree or disagree with the result? Give some examples of why or why not.
· What traits hinder you?
· What traits seem to help you in day to day activities?
Keep in mind what each criterion means by what was mentioned earlier in this assignment.
Submit the two tests results and answers to the questions in an essay in PDF format on Moodle before the due date.
My Results:
Factor I- extroversion 3%
Factor II- emotional stability 2%
Factor III- agreeableness 5%
Factor Iv- conscientiousness 18%
Factor V- Intellect/Imagination 40%
Factor I was labelled as Extroversion by the developers of the IPIP-BFFM. Factor I is sometimes given other names, such as Surgency or Positive Emotionality.
Extraversion is typically characterized by an individual’s tendency to seek out social interaction and stimulation, as well as their level of enthusiasm and assertiveness in social situations. Individuals who score high on this dimension tend to be outgoing, sociable, and talkative. They enjoy being around others and seek out social situations. They are often described as having a high level of energy, enthusiasm, and assertiveness. They may also be more likely to engage in risk-taking behaviors, such as partying, drinking, or other forms of excitement-seeking.
In contrast, individuals who score low on extraversion are more introverted and reserved. They may prefer to spend time alone or in small groups, and may feel uncomfortable in large social gatherings. They may also be less assertive and more cautious in their interactions with others.
Research has shown that extraversion is linked to a range of outcomes, including job performance, social support, and well-being. For example, individuals who score high on extraversion tend to be more successful in careers that involve social interaction and communication. They may also have more social support networks and experience higher levels of subjective well-being.
|
Factor II was labeled as Emotional Stability by the developers of the IPIP-BFFM. Factor II is often referred to by its low end, Neuroticism. Individuals who score high on emotional stability are characterized as being emotionally resilient, calm, and even-tempered. They tend to experience fewer negative emotions and are better able to cope with stress and adversity. They are also more likely to exhibit positive emotions, such as happiness, contentment, and enthusiasm. In contrast, individuals who score low on emotional stability tend to be more prone to negative emotions, such as anxiety, depression, and anger. They may be more reactive to stress and may find it difficult to cope with challenging situations. They may also exhibit a range of maladaptive behaviors, such as substance abuse or self-harm. Research has shown that emotional stability is linked to a range of outcomes, including mental health, physical health, and interpersonal relationships. For example, individuals who score high on emotional stability tend to have better mental health outcomes, such as lower rates of depression and anxiety. They may also have better physical health outcomes, such as lower rates of cardiovascular disease. Additionally, they tend to have more stable and supportive relationships with others. Factor III is labeled as Agreeableness. Individuals who score high on agreeableness are characterized as being warm, kind, and considerate. They tend to be cooperative and are motivated to maintain harmonious social relationships. They may also have a strong sense of empathy and concern for the welfare of others. In contrast, individuals who score low on agreeableness tend to be more competitive and skeptical. They may be less motivated to maintain social harmony and may be more likely to express their opinions forcefully, even if they may conflict with others. Research has shown that agreeableness is linked to a range of outcomes, including interpersonal relationships, job performance, and mental health. For example, individuals who score high on agreeableness tend to have more positive and supportive relationships with others. They may also be more successful in careers that require teamwork and collaboration. Additionally, they tend to have better mental health outcomes, such as lower rates of depression and anxiety. However, it is important to note that excessively high levels of agreeableness can also have negative consequences, such as being overly compliant or lacking assertiveness. Factor IV is labeled as Conscientiousness. Individuals who score high on conscientiousness are characterized as being reliable, hardworking, and efficient. They tend to be well-organized and responsible, and are motivated to achieve their goals. They may also exhibit a strong sense of self-discipline and perseverance. In contrast, individuals who score low on conscientiousness tend to be more impulsive and disorganized. They may have difficulty setting and achieving goals, and may be more likely to engage in behaviors that are not in their best interest. Research has shown that conscientiousness is linked to a range of outcomes, including academic and job performance, health behaviors, and longevity. For example, individuals who score high on conscientiousness tend to have better academic and job performance, as well as lower rates of absenteeism and turnover. They may also be more likely to engage in health-promoting behaviors, such as exercising regularly and maintaining a healthy diet. Additionally, they tend to live longer than individuals who score low on conscientiousness. However, it is important to note that excessively high levels of conscientiousness can also have negative consequences, such as being overly perfectionistic or rigid. Factor V was labeled as Intellect/Imagination by the developers of the IPIP-BFFM but it is also most commonly known in the literature as Openness to Experience. Individuals who score high on openness to experience are characterized as being imaginative, curious, and open to new ideas and experiences. They tend to be intellectually curious and enjoy exploring new concepts and ideas. They may also exhibit a preference for creativity and aesthetics. In contrast, individuals who score low on openness to experience tend to be more traditional and conservative. They may have a preference for familiar and predictable experiences, and may be less likely to seek out novel experiences. Research has shown that openness to experience is linked to a range of outcomes, including creativity, innovation, and cultural competence. For example, individuals who score high on openness to experience tend to be more creative and innovative, and may be more successful in careers that require these skills. Additionally, they tend to be more open-minded and accepting of diverse cultures and perspectives. However, it is important to note that excessively high levels of openness to experience can also have negative consequences, such as being overly impulsive or having difficulty with routine tasks. Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test™
Your Type
ISTPIntrovert(59%) Sensing(12%) Thinking(53%) Perceiving(6%)
|