This essay is a continuation of a project that I am doing on why i BELIEVE
legal non-immigrant resident status in the United States SHOULD NOT be eligible to receive access to Medicaid.
I will upload the previous assignments so you can can see the context and bemable to do this assignment, please read them to get the full context. phase1,phase2 and phase 3.
*Please write this essay in third person, not on first person.
For
the first part of this phase apply two decision-making models described
by Hammaker and Knadig (2017) to explain why the action being
considered is ethical or unethical (based upon your issue and thesis
statement). As part of the ethical decision-making process evaluate why
the two models are a valid way to decide whether an action or situation
is ethical or unethical. In addition, for both models discuss its
strengths and limitations towards decision-making.
Models for Decision-Making
- Social Media Model
- Utility Model
- Rights Model
- Exceptions Model
- Choices Model
- Justice Model
- Common Good Model
- Virtue Model
**Use appropriate APA headings when applying both models.
Conclusion
For the second part of this phase remind the audience of your
position and supporting evidence. Summarize the most important details
from your research and try for the last time to try to convince the
audience. The conclusion should illustrate that you have thought
critically and analytically about the ethical issue.
Consider these pointers when writing the conclusion:
- Your conclusion should not simply restate your intro paragraph. If
your conclusion says almost the exact same thing as your introduction,
it may indicate that you have not done enough critical thinking during
the course of your research project. - Your conclusion should tell us why we should care about your
research. What is the significance of your claim? Why is it important to
you as the writer or to the reader/audience? What information should
you or the audience take away from this? - Vivid, concrete language is as important in a conclusion as it is
elsewhere–perhaps more essential, since the conclusion determines the
audience’s final impression of your research. Do not leave them with the
impression that your position was vague or unsure. - It’s fine to introduce new information or quotations in your
conclusions, if the new points grow from your argument. New points might
be more general, answering the “so what” question; they might be quite
specific. Just avoid making new claims that need lots of additional
support.
The conclusion of your research project should be at least four to five paragraphs with support.
Length: 5 to 6 pages (can exceed the minimum length
requirement). Utilize substantial references (i.e. scholarly resources,
newspapers, books, PBSC library databases, Google Scholar, etc.) and
complete in-text citations-APA style.