12 pts
Excellent
1) Responds fully to the assignment; information clearly and effectively supports a central thesis and displays a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of the topic. 2) Provides compelling supporting arguments, evidence, examples, and details. The use of supporting detail is embedded in the discussion of the topic.
|
10 pts
Proficient
1) Responds in a competent manner to the assignment; information provides firm support for a central thesis and displays evidence of a basic analysis of the topic. 2) Provides adequate supporting arguments, evidence, examples, and details. The use of supporting detail is embedded in the discussion of the topic.
|
8 pts
Marginal
1) Responds adequately to the assignment; information supports thesis at times, but analysis is basic or general. Completes rather than engages in the assignment. 2) Does not provide adequate supporting arguments, evidence, examples, or details. The use of supporting detail is not appropriately embedded in the discussion of the topic.
|
6 pts
Poor
1) The paper does not adequately respond to the assignment. The paper does not successfully identify a thesis. Analysis is vague or not evident. 2) The paper does not provide adequate supporting arguments, evidence, examples and details. Paragraphs may “string together” quotations without embedding them in the discussion of the topic.
|
0 pts
Unacceptable
1) The paper does not adequately respond to the assignment. The paper does not successfully identify thesis. Analysis is vague or not evident. 2) The paper does not provide supporting arguments, evidence, examples and details.
|