I will need to provide two respopnses to one of my peers and my teacher. In text citation and APA format. No articles l
Preparing the Discussion
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
General Directions
Review the provided case study to complete this week’s discussion.
Include the following sections:
- Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
- Select one drug to treat the diagnosis(es) or symptoms.
- List medication class and mechanism of action for the chosen medication.
- Write the prescription in prescription format.
- Provide an evidence-based rationale for the selected medication using at least one scholarly reference. Textbooks may be used for additional references but are not the primary reference.
- List any side effects or adverse effects associated with the medication.
- Include any required diagnostic testing. State the time frame for this testing (testing is before medication initiation or q 3 months, etc.). Includes normal results range for any listed laboratory tests.
- Provide a minimum of three appropriate medication-related teaching points for the client and/or family.
- Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations:
- Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
- Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
- Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
- Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
- Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
- Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.
- Peer Response: Respond to at least one peer on a topic other than the initially assigned topic.
- Faculty Response: Respond to at least one faculty post.
- Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.
- Professionalism in Communication: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
- Reference Citation: Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.
- Wednesday Participation Requirement: Provide a substantive response to the graded discussion topic (not a response to a peer or faculty), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
- Total Participation Requirement: Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.
**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. ess than 5years old.
NR546 W5 Case Study Discussion Rubric | ||
---|---|---|
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
Application of Course Knowledge
view longer description
|
40 pts
Excellent
All requirements met. 36 pts
V. Good
5 requirements met. 33 pts
Satisfactory
4 requirements met. 20 pts
Needs Improvement
1-3 requirements met. 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met. |
/ 40 pts
|
Integration of Evidence
view longer description
|
20 pts
Excellent
All requirements met. 18 pts
V. Good
4 requirements met. 16 pts
Satisfactory
3 requirements met. 10 pts
Needs Improvement
1-2 requirements met. 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met. |
/ 20 pts
|
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
view longer description
|
30 pts
Excellent
All requirements met. 24 pts
Satisfactory
2 requirements met. 15 pts
Needs Improvement
1 requirement met. 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met. |
/ 30 pts
|
Professionalism in Communication
view longer description
|
5 pts
Excellent
0-1 errors. 4 pts
V. Good
2-3 errors. 3 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 errors. 2.5 pts
Needs Improvement
6-7 errors. 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than 7 errors. |
/ 5 pts
|
Reference Citation
view longer description
|
5 pts
Excellent
0-1 errors. 4 pts
V. Good
2 errors. 3 pts
Satisfactory
3-4 errors. 2.5 pts
Needs Improvement
5-6 errors. 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than 6 errors. |
/ 5 pts
|
Late Penalty Deduction
view longer description
|
0 pts
No Points Deducted
Posts submitted on time; no points deducted. 0 pts
Points Deducted
Posts submitted late. 10% deduction in points for initial posts entered after Wednesday. |
/ 0 pts
|
Total Participation
view longer description
|
0 pts
No Points Deducted
Posts submitted on a minimum of two separate days; no points deducted. 0 pts
Points Deducted
Participation requirement not met. 10% deduction in points for not posting on a minimum of two separate days. |
/ 0 pts
|
Total Points: 0 |