Introduction – Approximately 100-150 words
- Provide Context
- Make reference to the
research question - Explain the significance of this
topic. Why does it matter? - Thesis with 3 sub claims that answers
the research question. What will your reader learn about? - Sub claim 1
- Sub claim 2
- Sub claim 3
Body Paragraph 1 (Claim 1) – 250-350 words
- Topic Sentence (sub claim from thesis statement)
- Analysis of Perspectives and Sources
- Introduce 1st
Stakeholder Perspective’s argument w/credibility - Provide at
least one piece of evidence (Paraphrase, summarize, or quote source) w/
citation - Provide
Commentary: Explain how the evidence supports topic sentence and/or
thesis - Connect
Perspectives: Use “They Say I Say”
language to address similarities or differences to
the next perspective - Introduce 2nd
Stakeholder Perspective’s argument w/credibility - Provide at
least one piece of evidence (Paraphrase, summarize, or quote source) w/
citation - Provide
Commentary: Explain how the evidence supports topic sentence and/or
thesis - Connect
Perspectives: Use “They Say I Say”
language to address similarities or differences to
the next perspective - Introduce 3rd
Stakeholder Perspective’s argument w/credibility - Provide at
least one piece of evidence (Paraphrase, summarize, or quote source) w/
citation - Provide
Commentary: Explain how the evidence connects to the research question - Connect
Perspectives: Use “They Say I Say”
language to address similarities or differences to
the next perspective
Body Paragraph 2 (Claim 2) – 250-350 words
- Topic Sentence (sub claim from thesis statement)
- Analysis of Perspectives and Sources
- Introduce 1st
Stakeholder Perspective’s argument w/credibility - Provide at
least one piece of evidence (Paraphrase, summarize, or quote source) w/
citation - Provide
Commentary: Explain how the evidence supports topic sentence and/or
thesis - Connect
Perspectives: Use “They Say I Say”
language to address similarities or differences to
the next perspective - Introduce 2nd
Stakeholder Perspective’s argument w/credibility - Provide at
least one piece of evidence (Paraphrase, summarize, or quote source) w/
citation - Provide
Commentary: Explain how the evidence supports topic sentence and/or
thesis - Connect
Perspectives: Use “They Say I Say”
language to address similarities or differences to
the next perspective - Introduce 3rd
Stakeholder Perspective’s argument w/credibility - Provide at
least one piece of evidence (Paraphrase, summarize, or quote source) w/
citation - Provide
Commentary: Explain how the evidence connects to the research question - Connect
Perspectives: Use “They Say I Say”
language to address similarities or differences to
the next perspective
Body Paragraph
(Claim 3) – 250-350 words
- Topic Sentence (sub claim from thesis statement)
- Analysis of Perspectives and Sources
- Introduce 1st
Stakeholder Perspective’s argument w/credibility - Provide at
least one piece of evidence (Paraphrase, summarize, or quote source) w/
citation - Provide
Commentary: Explain how the evidence supports topic sentence and/or
thesis - Connect
Perspectives: Use “They Say I Say”
language to address similarities or differences to
the next perspective - Introduce 2nd
Stakeholder Perspective’s argument w/credibility - Provide at
least one piece of evidence (Paraphrase, summarize, or quote source) w/
citation - Provide
Commentary: Explain how the evidence supports topic sentence and/or
thesis - Connect
Perspectives: Use “They Say I Say”
language to address similarities or differences to
the next perspective - Introduce 3rd
Stakeholder Perspective’s argument w/credibility - Provide at
least one piece of evidence (Paraphrase, summarize, or quote source) w/ citation - Provide
Commentary: Explain how the evidence connects to the research question - Connect
Perspectives: Use “They Say I Say”
language to address similarities or differences to
the next perspective
Possible Solution and Conclusion – Approximately 100 –
150 words
o Explain possible
solution thoroughly
o Include benefits of the solution
o Counter with the ineffectiveness of the
solution (optional)
o Conclusion restating thesis and commentar
Claim I
The Ethical Responsibility of Enhancing Accessibility
Navigating the Ethics of Creativity and Originality in Technology-Driven Art
Establishing Ethical Frameworks for Technological Integration in Art