Presentation on Screening with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)

Introduced group established rapport, and explained the purpose of presentation in a creative, clear way capturing attention PRIOR to the presentation.

Started with a group introduction or “Our topic is” PRIOR to the presentation. Did not explain the purpose of the presentation.

Did not introduce the group OR did not explain the purpose of the presentation.

Did not clearly introduce the purpose of the presentation. Or nothing was submitted.

Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult.

Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult.

Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult.

Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult.

Nothing was submitted.

The screening tool used was discussed in detail. The tool used was highly specific and sensitive, based on current US evidence, to the population, ethnicity, age, and gender of the client. The raw score and its interpretation were discussed in detail.

The screening tool used was mentioned. The tool was poorly specific and sensitive to the population, ethnicity, age, and gender of the client. The raw score and its interpretation were mentioned.

The screening tool used was mentioned. The tool used was not recommended for the population, ethnicity, age, and/or gender of the client. The raw score was mentioned but not interpreted.

The screening tool used was mentioned.

Nothing was submitted.

Provides a summary of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, roadblocks and the client’s stage of change.

Provides a summary of 3 of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, roadblocks and the client’s stage of change.

Provides a summary of two of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, OR roadblocks OR the client’s stage of change.

The stages of the motivational interview were mentioned without detailed descriptions: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning.

Nothing was submitted.

Provides a detailed list of three or more referrals to local, large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. Includes a timeline for follow-up appointments.

Provides a detailed list of two referrals to local, large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. Includes a timeline for follow-up appointments.

Provides a detailed list of one referral to local, large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. A timeline for follow-up appointments is not provided.

A referral was not provided during the session. Or nothing was submitted.

References page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows 7th Edition APA guidelines of components e.g., double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent and in-text citations in 100% of the references.

References page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows 7th Edition APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations in up to 50% of the references.

References page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Follows 7th Edition APA e.g., double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations in at least 25% of the references.

References page does not include current, scholarly academic resources, only internet webpages or no reference page. Does not follow 7th Edition APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. Or nothing was submitted.

Audio-Video presentation contains 10-15 slides. Followed APA best practices for PowerPoints, e.g., color, legibility. Well-rehearsed. Voice, eye contact and pacing hold the interest and attention of the audience. Within 30 seconds of the time allotted for the presentation. Slides are professional and easy to read. Content enables speakers to focus on the presentation and provide the audience with essential resources for later consideration.

Audio-Video presentation contains a minimum of 10 slides. Followed APA best practices for PowerPoints, e.g., color, legibility. Communicated ideas with proper voice projection; perhaps one mispronounced word; made eye contact 75% of the time and never read from notes. Less than one minute over or under the allotted time.

Audio-Video presentation contains fewer than 10 slides, or some slides designed do not support the topic of the presentation. Followed APA best practices for PowerPoints, e.g., color, legibility. Poor voice projections; eye contact at least 25% of the time and appeared to read from notes; mispronounced > 10 words; long pauses. Presentation 1 minute over or under time allotted.

Audio-Video presentation was not submitted or the video was not created using the audio or video platform required in the instructions. Great difficulty communicating ideas. Poor voice projection; no eye contact and read from notes >75% of the time; mispronounced words > 10 words;stopped or had long pauses. More than 2 minutes over or under the allotted time. Or nothing was submitted.

The presentation is concluded by tying the content back to the opening with a dynamic 25 words or less close. Transitioned into so the audience was ready for it.

Ends presentation with “goodbye or the end.” There was no transition to closure or summary of the presentation.

Information is completely missing. Or nothing was submitted.