Toulmin Argument Essay: Embracing AI Integration in Education and Professional Fields

 In this assignment, you will need to establish your ethos as a writer – your audience (Fullerton College students) need to find you convincing. The readers need to believe you are “honest, wise and trustworthy.”(108)

Essay Prompt
Write a compelling argument about an issue relevant to your generation. Look back to your week 2 discussion board for ideas. Your argument structure must follow the Toulmin model.

Minimum Requirements
This assignment has the following formal requirements:

6-8 pages long, typed, double-spaced, in proper MLA format
Third or second-person perspective (no first person i.e., “I,” “me,” “my,” etc.)
An introduction that provides an overview of your topic
A specific claim that attempts to persuade an audience
An organized body of support that argues on behalf of your claim
3 or more reasons and pieces of evidence to support your claim (reality)
4 or more academic sources are used and properly cited (quotations and paraphrases) in order to help develop your claim (at least 3 of which must be scholarly, meaning peer-reviewed or an academic journal). Consult this Research 101 GuideLinks to an external site. for assistance.
A conclusion that summarizes your claim
A properly formatted Works Cited page
A similarity report of 25% or less on Turnitin.com, with zero plagiarism. You will do a plagiarism library workshop next week.
AI can be used for brainstorming, organization, and grammar; however, the text writing must be in your own words. Turnitin also gives an AI report. If your AI report is above 30%, you may be asked for documentation of your writing process (rough drafts or time stamps in Word)
Toulmin Model – Argument Structure
Claim – debatable and perhaps controversial value statement
Qualifiers -any limits you place on your claim
Reasons/Evidence – support for your claim
Warrant – underlying assumptions that support your claim
Backing – evidence for your warrant

RUBRIC:
Essay #3 Toulmin argument
Essay #3 Toulmin argument
Criteria Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and thesis
Exemplary
Strong introduction with a good hook. The thesis makes a strong assertion demonstrating critical analysis and insight as to the issue.
Accomplished
The topic is introduced with a hook and thesis makes an assertion, but only shows some critical analysis and insight as to the issue.
Developing
The thesis does not make a clear assertion and/or is simplistic and does not answer prompt.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasons and Evidence
Exemplary
Reasons reflect strong critical thinking and perceptive analysis. There are several examples develop pathos, and it is clearly tied to the minor assertions (or topic sentences).
Accomplished
Reasons reflect some critical thinking and analysis. There are a few examples to support the minor assertions (or topic sentences).
Developing
There are no example(s) and/or the examples are simplistic and obvious; there is not a clear connection to the minor assertions (topic sentences).
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Integration
Exemplary
The sources are integrated and perceptively used to support all parts of the Toulmin argument. Selections of quotes material reflect strong critical thinking. The quotes are clearly introduced to the reader in context, the quote is cited correctly, and an insightful interpretation is given. Accurate paraphrasing is used. The integration of the quotes shows a strong understanding of the source document and the author’s purpose.
Accomplished
Sources are integrated, but used to support one reason and not used in all parts of the Toulmin structure. There is one quote from each of the articles . Selections of quotes material reflect some critical thinking. The quotes are clearly introduced to the reader in context, and a clear interpretation is given. Signal phrases are logical and paraphrasing is accurate. . The integration of the quotes shows an understanding of the source document.
Developing
The essay integrates quotes from less than all required sources; selections do not reflect critical thinking. The quotes are not clearly introduced to the reader in context, and/or the quote is cited incorrectly, and/or there is not a clear interpretation given. The source selection does not meet criteria. Choices reflect a lack of understanding of source material or misinterpretation of source material and/or do not show evidence of a clear understanding of the topic
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
Exemplary
The writer reiterates the thesis in a perceptive way and refers to the overall impact of the topic on society including a call to action or appropriate concluding strategy.
Accomplished
The writer refers to the thesis and the overall impact of the issue on society, but may not effectively use a conclusion strategy.
Developing
The writer does not provide a sound conclusion and/or does not provide a call to action.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMLA Format
Exemplary
The paper, the parenthetical citations, and the works cited page follows MLA format without any errors.
Accomplished
The paper, the parenthetical citations, and the works cited page follows MLA format with few errors.
Developing
The paper follows MLA format but has glaring errors in format and/or errors in parenthetical citations, and/or the works cited page.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWell-written Prose
Exemplary
The essay progresses logically from one paragraph to the next with a strong sense of audience. Writer’s voice is clearly expressed with main ideas and logical references to the thesis. Skillful use of language with effective transitions.
Accomplished
The essay progresses logically from one paragraph to the next with a sense of audience. Writer’s voice is clear with main ideas and logical references to the thesis. Sentence-level errors are present, but do not interrupt the understanding of ideas.
Developing
The logic of the essay is difficult to follow due to lack of transitions or clear minor assertions (main ideas). The grammar and sentence-level errors interrupt the understanding of the ideas.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeToulmin Model
Exemplary
Writer includes qualifiers to limit the argument as well as solid reasons and evidence. There is a clear warrant expressed to connect the evidence to the claim. Includes clear backing for the warrant.
Accomplished
Writer uses some qualifiers and good reasons and evidence. The warrant may be implied but backing is included.
Developing
Writer does not use qualifiers to limit the scope of the argument. The warrant is not clearly expressed and/or backing for the warrant is not included.  This was a rough draft already uploaded for peer review:   

Toulmin Argument Essay: Embracing AI Integration in Education and Professional Fields
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed numerous industries, redefining workflows, and creating opportunities for innovation. For students and professionals, AI’s integration into education and professional settings represents not only a technological shift but also a cultural and academic evolution. While some resist this integration, viewing AI as a threat to traditional methods, its potential benefits outweigh the challenges. We should embrace AI integration into education and professional fields, especially in health and dental technology, as it enhances efficiency, precision, and innovation.
Claim
The adoption of AI across various sectors, particularly in health and dental technology, enables faster, more precise workflows, and cultivates innovation. By fostering this integration, educational institutions and professional environments can prepare individuals for a future driven by advanced technological solutions.
Qualifiers
1. AI integration should be implemented responsibly, with ethical considerations and proper guidelines.
2. The adoption of AI should complement, not replace, human expertise and creativity.
3. While AI has limitations, such as reliance on data quality and potential misuse, these challenges can be mitigated through structured policies and oversight.
Reasons and Evidence
Reason 1: AI Enhances Workflow Efficiency and Outcome Quality
a.Evidence: AI-driven tools, such as those used in Glidewell Laboratories, have demonstrated the capability to produce dental crowns in under an hour—a process that previously required meticulous and time-consuming labor.
b.Backing: According to industry reports, AI-driven systems like CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and manufacturing) reduce human error, ensuring consistency and high-quality outcomes in dental and health-related tasks.
c.Warrant: Faster, more accurate workflows translate into reduced production costs and improved patient satisfaction, solidifying AI as a valuable tool in healthcare.
Reason 2: AI Promotes Competitiveness and Career Relevance
a.Evidence: Professionals who integrate AI into their skill sets remain marketable and competitive, evidenced by trends in AI certification and training programs across industries.
b.Backing: Studies from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that demand for AI-related expertise has grown by 74% annually in industries such as healthcare, engineering, and business.
c.Warrant: By adapting to AI advancements, individuals can position themselves at the forefront of innovation, ensuring long-term career sustainability.
Reason 3: AI as an Educational Resource Prepares Students for the Future
a.Evidence: Colleges incorporating AI, like open-source platforms and AI-driven tools for research, better prepare students for AI-enhanced fields.
b.Backing: A 2022 Pew Research study indicates that students exposed to AI tools demonstrate higher adaptability and problem-solving skills compared to peers in traditional learning environments.
c.Warrant: By integrating AI responsibly, educational institutions equip students with the necessary tools to navigate and excel in AI-augmented industries.
Rebuttal
Opposition: Critics argue that AI may replace human jobs, especially in specialized fields like healthcare and education.
Response: While AI automates certain tasks, it enhances human capabilities by reducing repetitive work and allowing professionals to focus on complex, creative aspects of their roles. Additionally, the AI industry generates new job opportunities, including roles in development, maintenance, and ethical oversight.
Conclusion
AI integration in education and professional fields, particularly health and dental technology, offers unparalleled advantages in efficiency, precision, and innovation. Through responsible adoption, we can ensure AI complements human expertise, preparing students and professionals to lead in an evolving technological landscape. Institutions must embrace AI as a partner in learning and innovation, fostering a future where technology amplifies human potential.

Works Cited
1.Bureau of Labor Statistics. “The Growing Demand for AI Professionals.” Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 2022.
2.Pew Research Center. “AI in Education: Preparing Students for the Future.” Pew Research Reports, 2022.
3.Smith, John. AI Applications in Healthcare. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
4.Glidewell Laboratories. “The Evolution of Dental Technology: From Manual to AI-Driven Processes.” 2023.

Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!

Whatever paper you need - we will help you write it

Get started

Starts at $9 /page

How our paper writing service works

It's very simple!

  • Fill out the order form

    Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.

  • Choose writer

    Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.

  • Add funds

    Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.

  • Ready

    Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.