I have read through both your documents and find it hard to visualise the kind of research you plan to undertake and what questions you are asking. I also have concerns that you may have used AI to generate the proposal as, while on the surface it reads fluently, what you propose does not correspond with practitioner research and shows a limited understanding of constructivism (which is a pedagogical theory, not an aspect of HQTL). Refer to the suggested themes highlighted by the initial reading of Coe and Macgregor. You should also frame your question using the brief, referring to HQTL. Also, I checked a few of your references and some of the texts you have referred to do not exist (and if you include the DOI it makes it easier for me to see the thread of your argument). Please ensure you have a better understanding of practitioner research and edit both documents as soon as possible as you cannot begin your research until I have signed you off.
In addition to the learning materials on Blackboard, this reading list will help you understand practitioner research and research methodologies:
Can you edit these documents (do not resubmit new documents please):
Nemanja_Radmilovic_RadmilovicN_Ethics 1.docx
Nemanja_Radmilovic_RadmilovicN_Prop 1.docx
If you have used AI, it would be appropriate for you to declare this now. As this is a formative assessment, you will not be penalised and can simply resubmit the work, and if indeed you have used AI, you will need to acknowledge this in your writing.
I must also inform you that incidents like this for summative assessments where there is suspicion of breaching the academic regulations in the form of unattributed content created by artificial intelligence or another generating technology will be treated more seriously and may be considered academic malpractice. If you would like more information about this, please see the academic regulations which can be found on the university website.
Can I also remind you that I have limited time as I am contracted as 0.2 and have other roles and commitments besides this PGCE non-QTS. The time I have taken to look at your proposal and ethics form, write these emails and communicate with the module lead as regards to your work is far beyond what I have done for your peers. Please be respectful of my time and do this assignment properly and with consideration. I do want you to do well.