Note:- Do not submit Zip files, only Doc or PDF are good to submit. No Zip folders need to be uploaded. Upload direct files.
—————————————————————————————–
The task is to write a research report on a particular topic. Write enough words (2500 min) to wrap up your explanations, excluding the cover page and references.
Please use single spacing while writing the report. Also, put a caption for any figure and table and choose any reference style for your report (APA, Chicago, MLA).
Do NOT include Wikipedia as a reference. Plagiarism should not exceed 30 – 40%.
Topics (Topic ID mentioned) are listed below:
1. IPV6 Implementation (IPV6 structure, feasibility of implementing an IPv6 protocol, business ramifications of implementing IPv6)
2. Wired Network Security (Controlling access, Access rights, Protocols, Security policy design issues, Standards)
3. Wireless Network Security (Configuring wireless access points/adapters, WLAN vulnerabilities, Protocols, WPS, WEP, WPA2, IEEE standards)
4. Bluetooth, NFC, and Airdrop (How they work, features, pros and cons, device supported, etc)
5. Network Design and Management (Network Modeling, Feasibility studies, Capacity Planning, Creating a Baseline, Network Admin skills)
6. Research topic on Network Diagnostic Tools (At least six tools)
–> How to pick your one topic? See the below table and the first letter of your last name; for example, if it is V, then your topic will be 6, which is “research on at least six network diagnostic tolls.”
Topic IDStudent’s Last Name(Starts with)1A-D2E-H3I-L4M-P5Q-T6U-Z View RubricPaper Writing (PSLO 1)CriteriaPointsReadabilityview longer descriptionExceeds Expectation· Logically Organized
· Easy to follow
· Effective and smooth transitions13.4 to 20 ptsMeets ExpectationSome digressions, ambiguities, and irrelevances
· Difficult to follow with some rereading needed
· Ineffective transitions6.8 to 13.3 ptsNeeds ImprovementNo apparent organization
· Difficult to follow with frequent rereading needed
· Poor transitions0.1 to 6.7 ptsNo MarksNo Response0 pts/20 ptsContentview longer descriptionExceeds Expectation· Central idea well-developed
· Clarity of purpose60.1 to 100 ptsMeets Expectation· Central idea vague or too broad
· Some sense of purpose throughout the paper20.1 to 60 ptsNeeds Improvement· Central idea and clarity of purpose absent in the paper0.1 to 20 ptsNo MarksNo Response0 pts/100 ptsLanguageview longer descriptionExceeds Expectation· Sophisticated and correct use of vocabulary
· Clear and appropriate tone for the intended audience13.1 to 20 ptsMeets Expectation· Frequent misuse of correct vocabulary
· Some level of inappropriate tone6.1 to 13 ptsNeeds Improvement· Unsophisticated and inappropriate use of vocabulary
· Inappropriate tone for the audience0.1 to 6 ptsNo MarksNo Response0 pts/20 ptsFormatview longer descriptionExceeds ExpectationProfessional format12.1 to 20 ptsMeets ExpectationUnorganized Format4.1 to 12 ptsNeeds ImprovementNo formatting0.1 to 4 ptsNo MarksNo response0 pts/20 ptsGrammarview longer descriptionExceeds Expectation· Use of complex sentences for effect and impact
· No punctuation or mechanical errors13.1 to 20 ptsMeets Expectation· Use of compound sentences
· Several punctuation and/or mechanical errors6.1 to 13 ptsNeeds Improvement· Use of simple, choppy sentences
· Many punctuation and/or mechanical errors0.1 to 6 ptsNo MarksNo Response0 pts/20 ptsCitationview longer descriptionExceeds Expectation· All factual information cited
· Citations and references adhere to a professional style (example: APA, MLA, Chicago)12.1 to 20 ptsMeets Expectation· Some citations missing where needed
· Citations and references inconsistent with a professional style6.1 to 12 ptsNeeds Improvement· No citations for factual information
· Citations and references do not follow a professional style0.1 to 6 ptsNo MarksNo Response0 pts/20 pts