It only needs to be 5 paragragraphs. Breakdown is below. Please do not use any AI they have a checker here.
|
Write a Persuasive Essay Performance Evaluation Checklist |
||
|
Student Name: |
Squad: |
Rank: |
|
SGL/Instructor’s Name: |
Class: |
Date: |
|
Evaluation Standards: Far Exceeded Standard (FES): 95-100 Exceeded Standards (ES): 85-94 Met Standard (MS): 84-70 Did Not Meet Standard (DNMS): below 70 |
||
|
PERFORMANCE MEASURES |
MAX |
POINTS RECEIVED |
|
INTRODUCTION |
(10) |
|
|
Introduction |
10 |
|
|
TOPIC BODY |
(40) |
|
|
Main Points (Support to |
10 |
|
|
Support Points (Support to |
10 |
|
|
Analysis of Information |
20 |
|
|
CONCLUSION |
(10) |
|
|
Conclusion |
10 |
|
|
SEQUENCING AND TRANSITIONS |
(10) |
|
|
Sequencing and Transitions |
10 |
|
|
GRAMMAR AND CORRECTNESS |
(10) |
|
|
Grammar and Correctness |
10 |
|
|
READABILITY |
(10) |
|
|
Readability |
10 |
|
|
APA FORMATTING |
(5) |
|
|
APA Formatting |
5 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
(5) |
|
|
References |
5 |
|
|
TOTAL POINTS: |
(100) |
|
|
OVERALL EVALUATION (circle one): FES ES MS DNMS |
||
|
Comments: |
||
|
SGL/Instructor’s Signature: |
Student’s Signature: |
Date: |
INTRODUCTION
DNMS (0-6):
DOES NOT ADEQUATELY CONVEY THE TOPIC. DOES NOT DESCRIBE MAIN POINTS TO BE
REVIEWED. DOES NOT INCLUDE THESIS
STATEMENT.
MS (7-8): CONVEYS TOPIC, DESCRIBES MAIN
POINTS. INCLUDED THESIS STATEMENT.
FES (9-10): STRONG INTRODUCTION OF TOPIC WHICH CATCHES READERS
ATTENTION, CLEARLY DELINEATES MAIN POINTS
TO BE REVIEWED. INCLUDES A WELL WRITTEN THESIS STATEMENT WHICH
DEMONSTRATES CRITICAL THINKING.
TOPIC BODY
MAIN
POINTS
DNMS (0): MAIN POINTS DO NOT
SUPPORT THESIS
DNMS (1-6): MAIN POINTS
PARTIALLY SUPPORT THESIS
MS (7-8): CONTAINS THREE POINTS WHICH
GENERALLY SUPPORT THESIS
FES (9-10): CONTAINS THREE MAIN POINTS
WHICH STRONGLY SUPPORT THESIS AND ARE PERSUASIVE
SUPPORT POINTS
DNMS (0): FAILED TO INCLUDE
SUPPORT TO MAIN POINTS
DNMS (1-6): SUPPORT POINTS DID
NOT SUPPORT MAIN POINTS
MS (7-8): INCLUDES TWO SUPPORT POINTS PER
MAIN POINT
FES (9-10): INCLUDES THREE OR
MORE SUPPORT POINTS PER MAIN POINT
ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION
DNMS (0):
FAILED TO SHOW ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION, FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE A PERSUASIVE
ARGUMENT DNMS (2-13): ANALYSIS PARTIALLY
SUPPORTS INFORMATION
MS (14-17): ANALYSIS SUPPORT
INFORMATION
FES (18-20): ANALYSIS
DEMONSTRATES IN-DEPTH RESEARCH AND CRITICAL THINKING (PROVIDES THE WHY)
CONCLUSION
DNMS (0): DOES NOT INCLUDE A
CONCLUSION
DNMS (1-6): CONCLUSION INTRODUCES NEW INFORMATION; DOES NOT
SUMMARIZE THESIS OR MAIN POINTS
MS (7-8): CONCLUSION IS ONE PARAGRAPH. IT SUMMARIZES THE BODY
PARAGRAPHS BUT DOES NOT CONCLUDE THE ESSAY
(DOES NOT RE-ENFORCE PERSUASIVE PORTION OF ESSAY)
FES (9-10):
CONCLUSION IS ONE PARAGRAPH. IT SUMMARIZES THE BODY PARAGRAPHS AND CONCLUDES
THE ESSAY (RE ENFORCES PERSUASIVE PORTION OF ESSAY)
SEQUENCING AND TRANSITIONS
DNMS (0-6): MATERIAL IS NOT LOGICALLY ORGANIZED. MANY TRANSITIONS
ARE UNCLEAR OR NONEXISTENT.
MS (7-8): MOST MATERIAL CLEARLY RELATED TO MAIN POINTS AND SUPPORT
POINTS. MATERIAL MAY NOT BE WITHIN
SUPPORT POINTS. ATTEMPT TO PROVIDE TRANSITIONS.
FES (9-10): STRONG ORGANIZATION AND INTEGRATION OF MATERIAL WITHIN
MAIN POINTS. STRONG TRANSITIONS LINKING
SUPPORT POINTS TO MAIN POINTS.
GRAMMAR AND CORRECTNESS
(GRAMMATICAL,
SPELLING AND PUNCTUATION ERRORS)
0 POINTS: 21-22 ERRORS 5 POINTS: 11-12 ERRORS 10 POINTS: 0-2
ERRORS 1 POINT: 19-20 ERRORS 6 POINTS:
9-10 ERRORS
2POINTS: 17-18 ERRORS 7 POINTS: 7-8 ERRORS
3 POINTS: 15-16 ERRORS 8 POINTS: 5-6 ERRORS
4 POINTS: 13-14 ERRORS 9 POINTS:
3-4 ERRORS
READABILITY
DNMS (0-6):
WORD CHOICE IS INFORMAL IN TONE. WRITING IS CHOPPY MORE THEN 5 AWKWARD OR
UNCLEAR PASSAGES MS (7-8): WRITING HAS
MORE THEN 3 BUT LESS THEN 5 AWKWARD OR UNCLEAR PASSAGES
FES (9-10): WRITING FLOWS AND IS EASY TO
READ, LESS THEN 3 AWKWARD OR UNCLEAR PASSAGES
APA FORMATTING
DNMS (0-3):
MORE THEN 5 ERRORS IN APA STYLE. ERRORS IN APA STYLE DETRACT SUBSTANTIALLY FROM
THE PAPER MS (4): NO MORE THEN 3 ERRORS
IN APA STYLE. ERRORS IN APA STYLE DO NOT DETRACT FROM THE PAPER
FES (5): NO ERRORS IN APA STYLE.
POSSESSES A SCHOLARLY STYLE
REFERENCES
DNMS (0): NO REFERENCES INCLUDED
DNMS (1): NO PROPERLY FORMATTED
REFERENCES
DNMS (2): ONLY ONE PROPERLY
FORMATTED REFERENCE
DNMS (3): TWO PROPERLY FORMATTED REFERENCES BUT NO IN-TEXT
CITATIONS MS (4): TWO PROPERLY FORMATTED
REFERENCES THAT MATCH IN-TEXT CITATIONS
FES (5): MORE THAN TWO PROPERLY FORMATTED REFERENCES THAT MATCH
IN-TEXT CITATIONS