Alzheimer’s disease (Based on interactive media-See the details and rubric below).Please upload a plagirism report
January 16, 2024January 16, 2024
Discipline: Nursing
To Prepare:
Review the interactive media (see below) piece assigned by your Instructor.
Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece.
Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned.
You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this patient. Reflect on potential co-morbid physical as well as patient factors that might impact the patient’s diagnosis and treatment.
———————————————————
Write a 3 page summary paper that addresses the following:
Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.
Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.
—————————————————————————————
Interactive media https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6521/05/mm/decision_trees/week_10/index.html
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBriefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Be specific.
20to >17.8pts
Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail the patient case study assigned, including specific and complete details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.
17.8to >15.8pts
Good
The response accurately summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.
15.8to >13.8pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.
13.8to >0pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented, or is missing.
20pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
25to >22.25pts
Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. … The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.
22.25to >19.75pts
Good
The response accurately explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. … The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate.
19.75to >17.25pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. … The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided.
17.25to >0pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature, or is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing.
25pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
20to >17.8pts
Excellent
The response accurately and thorough explains in detail what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommend for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.
17.8to >15.8pts
Good
The response accurately explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate.
15.8to >13.8pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided.
13.8to >0pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned, or is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing.
20pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.
20to >17.8pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. … The response provides specific, accurate, and relevant examples that fully support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.
17.8to >15.8pts
Good
The response accurately explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. … The response provides accurate examples that support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.
15.8to >13.8pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. … The response provides inaccurate or vague examples that may or may not support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.
13.8to >0pts
Poor
vaguely explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise, or is missing. … The response provides inaccurate and vague examples that do not support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise, or is missing.
20pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5to >4.45pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4.45to >3.95pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.95to >3.45pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
3.45to >0pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
5pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5to >4.45pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
4.45to >3.95pts
Good
Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.95to >3.45pts
Fair
Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.45to >0pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
5pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5to >4.45pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors
4.45to >3.95pts
Good
Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors
3.95to >3.45pts
Fair
Contains several (3–4) APA format errors
3.45to >0pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
5pts
Total Points:100
PreviousNext
Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!
Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.
Choose writer
Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.
Add funds
Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.
Ready
Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.