Argumentative essay: According to Kant, we would not demand that everybody like chocolate donuts just because we happen to like them, but we would insist that our statement, “this rose is beautiful” is a universally correct judgment. Explain and evaluate Kant’s claim that we can suppose we have an expectation that other people will agree […]
Discipline: Philosophy
Philosophy Essay: Central differences Utilitarianism and Kant’s deontological ethicsPhilosophy Essay: Central differences Utilitarianism and Kant’s deontological ethics
Use the following prompt and answer it. The answer to the prompt must be 4-5 paragraphs. It should include one paragraph with a clear and precise rearticulation of the prompt. The thesis is the claim that you will be defending in your response. This should be followed by 3-4 paragraphs containing at least one direct […]
Take a specific stance towards the issue of moral relativism–that is, do you think that the position is correct (and is thus a reasonable account of the nature of moral judgments) or not? And then offer concrete clear arguments for your positionTake a specific stance towards the issue of moral relativism–that is, do you think that the position is correct (and is thus a reasonable account of the nature of moral judgments) or not? And then offer concrete clear arguments for your position
offer a critical assessment of it–the idea of “critical” here does not mean you must reject it, but rather you need to propose arguments for or against it. it, offering arguments either in defense of it [i.e. show why the argument works and should be accepted] or against it [i.e. show what is wrong with […]
human nature and why it’s important to understand when dealing with the governmenthuman nature and why it’s important to understand when dealing with the government
For this reflection paper, I would like you write at least one paragraph of 4-5 sentences on your thoughts in your own words on the following: In an introductory paragraph, summarize in your own words what is meant by “human nature”, the difference between it and personality or personal experience, and the reason(s) understanding human […]
Biological features of technology, and how this technology has diversified over its history to form a phylogenetic tree.Biological features of technology, and how this technology has diversified over its history to form a phylogenetic tree.
Select some technology that is in use today but that has been around since you were young (In my case: Gaming systems, headphones, cell phones, TV’s, and computers. You can also research other technology that has been around since theearly 2000s and is still being used today). You must answer two questions about this technology: […]
Compare Horkheimer’s critique of “instrumental rationality” and Heidegger’s depiction of technological thinkingCompare Horkheimer’s critique of “instrumental rationality” and Heidegger’s depiction of technological thinking
please just quote from the these chapters from the book 1. Heidegger, “What is Metaphysics” 2. Horkheimer, “Means and Ends” 3. Horkheimer, “On the Concept of Philosophy” 4. Heidegger, “The Question Concerning Technology”. do not use ai to write it, at least 6 quote. thanks
Ethics, The difference between “Consequentialism” and “Non-Consequentialism” (Capital Punishment)Ethics, The difference between “Consequentialism” and “Non-Consequentialism” (Capital Punishment)
In one full paragraph, please explain the difference between “Consequentialism” and “Non-Consequentialism.” In your explanation, please use at least one example of an ethical decision that you have *personally* had to consider. (In other words, how would a Consequentialist approach the decision you had to make? How would a Non-Consequentialist approach that very same decision?) […]
Examine Phenomenology of Spirit in paragraph 187, linking it to self-sufficiency and non-self-sufficiency in the assigned passages. Explore the master-servant dynamic and assess if Hegel’s view of self-sufficiency implies criticism of Descartes’s view.Examine Phenomenology of Spirit in paragraph 187, linking it to self-sufficiency and non-self-sufficiency in the assigned passages. Explore the master-servant dynamic and assess if Hegel’s view of self-sufficiency implies criticism of Descartes’s view.
Since you are required to be succinct, focus simply on stating the key ideas directly and simply. You do not need a flowery introduction or any kind of “hook.” You should begin simply by stating directly the conclusion of the argument that you outline in the paper. In the remainder of your paper, you should set out […]
Philosophy 2nd year module – Question: “Explain and assess at least one objection to Locke’s hypothesis of thinking matter.” (aim for score of 75-85 please)Philosophy 2nd year module – Question: “Explain and assess at least one objection to Locke’s hypothesis of thinking matter.” (aim for score of 75-85 please)
Question for Philosophy 2nd year module “Explain and assess at least one objection to Locke’s hypothesis of thinking matter.” I have attached an example of a first class essay but please do not write a first class essay. Use this essay as an example of the level of writing required for a first class mark […]
Compare the corrupting teachings of The Prince and the Discourses from the perspective of the homily Pope Benedict delivered at his 4/24/05 installation Mass. Would the pope have found the two books equally objectionable?Compare the corrupting teachings of The Prince and the Discourses from the perspective of the homily Pope Benedict delivered at his 4/24/05 installation Mass. Would the pope have found the two books equally objectionable?
Cite directly from the Discourses on Livy and The Prince both by machiavelli, as well as the homily attached Use The Prince (Chicago edition) and Discourses on Livy (Chicago) provide direct quotes from each of the sources.