You will read the atricle titled “The Frivolity of Evil”, then you will answer the following questions pertaining this article in 1000-1500 words What is the author’s main argument? How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? Do you agree or disagree with him? Why or why not? After doing so you […]
Discipline: Philosophy
Nurturing a Purposeful Life through Learning, Connections, Exploration, Reflection, and ContributionNurturing a Purposeful Life through Learning, Connections, Exploration, Reflection, and Contribution
The field of ethics invites us to reflect carefully on we most deeply value and what we most want out of life. In doing ethics, in addition to thinking broadly about human flourishing, each of us asks, What does human flourishing look like for me personally? What should I do with the finite amount of time that […]
Augustine’s perspective on the nature of evil, exploring his theological insights and their implications for understanding morality and human existence.Augustine’s perspective on the nature of evil, exploring his theological insights and their implications for understanding morality and human existence.
1. A detailed explanation of the system of thinker under study. 2. Be sure to demonstrate command of the knowledge by using your own examples, and elaborating the theory in your own way and in your own words. 3. Be sure to apply the theory to actual example – demonstrating that you understand how […]
Essay: In Book IV, Aristotle describes different types of democracies and oligarchies. Based on these, how would Aristotle categorize American democracy? Would he approve of it?Essay: In Book IV, Aristotle describes different types of democracies and oligarchies. Based on these, how would Aristotle categorize American democracy? Would he approve of it?
You should aim to write around 1500 words. There is no need to engage secondary sources to answer any of the questions here. Use textual evidence from the text to support claims you make. Good papers will dig deeply into the presuppositions made by the authors and come to a well-argued conclusion about these using […]
Compare and contrast the various ways in which the enslaved or subjugated asserted their humanity in Toussaint L’Ouverture and the other accounts of slaveryCompare and contrast the various ways in which the enslaved or subjugated asserted their humanity in Toussaint L’Ouverture and the other accounts of slavery
Compare and contrast the various ways in which the enslaved or subjugated asserted their humanity in Toussaint L’Ouverture and the other accounts of slavery that we have read. What are the most effective strategies for asserting one’s humanity? Explain and defend your answer.
In this paper you will develop your preferred response to the non-identity problem.In this paper you will develop your preferred response to the non-identity problem.
Start by explaining what the non-identity problem is, as clearly and succinctly as you can. Then explain one line of response to the problem (example: ‘someone might argue that there are ways to wrong that do not consistent in harming …’). Be sure to define any important terms as you do (e.g., ‘harm’), and explain […]
In your view, are there moral facts? If so, what are they? Present an original example, and defend your view based on it.In your view, are there moral facts? If so, what are they? Present an original example, and defend your view based on it.
You will defend your view, but this must be a philosophical view supported by an argument, not a subjective thought. Address the prompt completely. If the prompt includes more than one question or aspect, your paper should address all of them. State your thesis at the very beginning of your paper. Make your argumentative steps […]
Explain Socrates’ distinction between what is loved (i.e., that which is loved) and loving. Here you should explain Socrates’ initial confusion about this distinction (see 204c) and why he now recognizes his earlier position to be confusedExplain Socrates’ distinction between what is loved (i.e., that which is loved) and loving. Here you should explain Socrates’ initial confusion about this distinction (see 204c) and why he now recognizes his earlier position to be confused
use these 2 refs ALLEN, R. E. (1989). The Dialogues of Plato: The Symposium (Vol. 11). Yale University Press. Nussbaum, M. (1979). THE SPEECH OF ALCIBIADES: A READING OF PLATO’S SYMPOSIUM. Philosophy and Literature, 3, 131–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.1979.0024 – aim to interpret others’ arguments in the most charitable way consistent with the text. The point of philosophy […]
realism in international relations and international relations as a state of naturerealism in international relations and international relations as a state of nature
the Essay is based off the reading by Charles Beitz, Political Theory and International Relations. However the essay should focus on Part 1 of Beitz reading (International Relations as a State of Nature). you can find the reading free online or through this link; http://debracollege.dspaces.org/bitstream/123456789/446/1/Charles%20R.%20Beitz%20-%20Political%20Theory%20and%20International%20Relations-Princeton%20University%20Press%20%281999%29.pdf I would like NO use of Chatgpt or AI generative software.
Choose a specific argument from the entire essay and argue for or against it. Use the Cultural Relativism Section.Choose a specific argument from the entire essay and argue for or against it. Use the Cultural Relativism Section.
Provide a brief introduction that makes clear the reading and central question / point that you’ll be discussing and provides a thesis statement that states what you will be arguing in response and briefly lists your main reason (s). • 2) Explain, in your own words, the author’s position on that question or point • […]