Class is MSAS 612 – APA 7th Edition is required for all citations and references. 3-5 slide presentation (preferably 5) with audio is required. Audio can be AI generated.
For this activity, you will develop a Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) for a common task for a non-flight organization workplace. To get started, review the Baggage Handling eTool (OSHA) of an airport (select the arrows associated with each type of baggage handling system to view identified hazards and potential solutions).
Note: Any tasks detailed in the OSHA eTool (ticket counter, make-up room, and baggage handling) are NOT acceptable for this activity or your research project!
Your assignment may be for a task in your selected workplace program for your white paper research project. You will identify that task or work area in the next activity. Using your selected workplace program is encouraged for this activity as it will help you generate the mindset for creating the required safety program for your project. JHA is a step-by-step process! Please see Job Hazard Analysis: A Step-By-Step Guide (SIAIG)Links to an external site. for a review.
- Your presentation should be no more than ten slides (3-5 is ideal).
- To develop your JHA, you may incorporate or use the JHA Analysis Worksheet (DOCX).Download JHA Analysis Worksheet (DOCX).
- Your presentation must have audio (any type of audio is acceptable for the assignment).
- Don’t be afraid to take some creative license and think about how you can incorporate other visual aids to add to your presentation.
- You may submit it in any format that works best for your JHA:
- a file upload,
- embedded HTML presentation,
- or a link to an external presentation, etc.
Note: Refer to the Media Hub (ERAU) (Links to an external site.) to make informed decisions about the media you create.
Review the presentation rubric before submitting your assignment to identify the qualities of effective participation in this activity.
Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.
This activity supports Module Objective(s) 2 & 3 and Learning Outcome(s) 4.
| 3.2 Assignment: CoA GR Presentation Rubric V3 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|
Presentation Objectives
|
20 pts
Superior: Exceeds Standards: 20 – 18 points
Presentation addresses all aspects of the assignment objectives and requirements. 17 pts
Average: Meets Standards: 17 – 16 points
Presentation only partially addresses all aspects of the assignment objectives and requirements. 15 pts
Poor: Does Not Meet Standards: 15 – 14 points
Presentation does not address all aspects of the assignment objectives and requirements. 0 pts
Fail: 13 – 0 points
Does not meet minimal standards. |
/ 20 pts
|
|
Research
|
20 pts
Superior: Exceeds Standards: 20 – 18 points
Presentation provides tangible evidence of a valid and relevant scholarly research effort. It considers scholarly literature, module resources on the topic and other sources of data 17 pts
Average: Meets Standards: 17 – 16 points
Presentation provides some evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort. It considers some scholarly literature, module resources on the topic and other sources of data. Some inadequate and other common, unreliable sources. 15 pts
Poor: Does Not Meet Standards: 15 – 14 points
Presentation does not provide solid evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort. It does not consider scholarly literature, module resources on the topic and other sources of data. The presentation uses inadequate or non-academic resources. 0 pts
Fail: 13 – 0 points
Does not meet minimal standards. |
/ 20 pts
|
|
Critical Thought
|
20 pts
Superior: Exceeds Standards: 20 – 18 points
Presentation demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions. 17 pts
Average: Meets Standards: 17 – 16 points
Presentation demonstrates some application of first-order critical thought that either only partially support project conclusions. 15 pts
Poor: Does Not Meet Standards: 15 – 14 points
Presentation does not demonstrate the application of critical thought that support project conclusions or does not include project conclusions. 0 pts
Fail: 13 – 0 points
Does not meet minimal standards. |
/ 20 pts
|
|
Logical Format and Structure
|
20 pts
Superior: Exceeds Standards: 20 – 18 points
Presentation exhibits excellent logic in format and structure in all aspects. 17 pts
Average: Meets Standards: 17 – 16 points
Presentation exhibits logic in format and structure in most aspects. 15 pts
Poor: Does Not Meet Standards: 15 – 14 points
Presentation does not exhibits logic in format and structure in all aspects. 0 pts
Fail: 13 – 0 points
Does not meet minimal standards. |
/ 20 pts
|
|
Grammar, Punctuation, Style, APA Format
|
10 pts
Superior: Exceeds Standards: 10 – 9 points
All aspects of the Presentation illustrates correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style and proper APA Format. 8 pts
Average: Meets Standards: 8 – 7 points
All aspects of the Presentation illustrates correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style and proper APA Format with some minor errors. 6 pts
Poor: Does Not Meet Standards: 6
The presentation includes many errors in grammar, punctuation, and writing style and APA Format. 0 pts
Fail: 5 – 0 points
Does not meet minimal standards. |
/ 10 pts
|
|
Delivery, Length, Aesthetics
|
10 pts
Superior: Exceeds Standards: 10 – 9 points
Includes appropriate images (including sources), presented in a creative fashion to meet the assignment requirements. Contains the specified number slides and presenter discusses each slide. Student enunciates clearly with volume that is understandable, or a transcript is provided 8 pts
Average: Meets Standards: 8 – 7 points
Includes average images (including sources), presented in a basic fashion to meet the assignment requirements. Slide number is barely adequate and presenter discusses each slide by reading text. Student delivery deficient or halting , or a transcript may not be provided 6 pts
Poor: Does Not Meet Standards: 6 points
Does not includes appropriate images (including sources), presentation does not meet the assignment requirements. Specified number slides inadequate and presenter not adequately discusses each slide. Student delivery is muddled. Transcript is not provided 0 pts
Fail: 5 – 0 points
Does not meet minimal standards. |
/ 10 pts
|
| Total Points: 0 |