500-word Discussion Post: 100-word response (Please read instructions thoroughly)

Instrusctions for 500-word post: The path an inmate travels through the criminal justice system is often marked by human error, bias, and systemic discrimination. The initial encounter between an individual and the police officer on the scene can be a defining moment, shaping the trajectory of the case and influencing the severity of the eventual sentence. This first interaction is critical, as it can either accelerate or mitigate the impact of the law.
Prominent figures such as Nicky Barnes and John Gotti demonstrate how systemic flaws can result in certain individuals escaping the full weight of the law, revealing the limitations of both legal processes and law enforcement. On the other hand, individuals like Luis “King Blood” Felipe and Stanley “Tookie” Williams faced outcomes that, while argued as justified, have also been labeled by many as cruel and unusual punishment. These cases raise profound questions about the nature of justice: What is true justice, and is the courtroom the best venue to find it?
For this discussion, I want you to reflect on a real-world case from your lifetime where an inmate’s socioeconomic status, race, or geographic location significantly influenced the sentencing outcome. Consider how these factors, along with police perceptions, moral responsibilities, and public pressures, may have shaped the final verdict. In your opinion, to what extent did these elements impact the case, and if you were the presiding judge, what would your final decision have been?
Please keep your response to 500 words max. In addition to your own analysis, respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts, thoughtfully extending or challenging their views. Be clear in your analysis, as the grading standards have increased.

______________________________________________________________

In a seperate response…


100-word response should challenge/extend the following text: From the top of my head, I’m going to be doing the Zimmerman case because I remember when I was 10, it was very controversial. The reason it was so controversial was due to the race of the victim that was killed which he was an African American 17 year old teenager and the only reason why Zimmerman was found not guilty was his skin color, he’s a white individual. George Zimmerman was a hispanic neighborhood watch member, he saw this black teenager named Trayvon Martin walking to his house from a 7-eleven when it was rainy and hard to see. When Zimmerman saw the teenager, he immediately called the police saying that Martin looked like a “real suspicious guy” and stated that Treyvon didn’t belong in the gated community. Apparently, Martin assaulted Zimmerman and Zimmerman argued that he used “self-defense” and killed the teenager. After the incident, on April 11, 2012, George Zimmerman was charged with second-degree murder of killing Treyvon Martin. Zimmerman’s main defense was the “stand-your-ground-law”, meaning that the state law permits you to using deadly force in self-defense without even trying to retreat first. Over the course of two days and after 16 hours of deliberations, on July 13, 2013, a jury that contained six people stated that George Zimmerman was found “not guilty” on both charges including the manslaughter one. Almost all the elements that were mentioned in the instructions definitely impacted the case and the sentencing outcome. By far due to the fact that George Zimmerman was white, nothing really happened to him and he was found not guilty. I get the state law and stuff but Zimmerman’s story kind of didn’t make any sense and it was pretty absurd. I mean, we couldn’t have Martin come to testify and defend his position because he was killed by Zimmerman, so there was only Zimmerman to defend his point. I don’t think it has anything to do with Zimmerman’s socioeconomic status because the trial stated that Zimmerman didn’t even have money and that the state had to help pay the costs and trials are expensive. When the cops arrived due to Zimmerman’s call, they probably took his side of the story because Zimmerman is white and the majority of cops are white statistically speaking. I guess the jury perceived Zimmerman of having a moral responsibility of defending and looking after himself during the incident. There was so much public pressure during the trial because I’m pretty sure you can guess it, the public was thinking that Zimmerman was just getting his way due to his skin color of being white. Although, I suppose it wasn’t enough public pressure to make the biggest impact on the final verdict against Zimmerman. I still remember when I was 10 and a riot happened aftermath of the final verdict, the public went wild. If I was a judge, my honest final decision for Zimmerman would be guilty for second-degree murder for 20 years but eligible for parole.

Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!

Whatever paper you need - we will help you write it

Get started

Starts at $9 /page

How our paper writing service works

It's very simple!

  • Fill out the order form

    Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.

  • Choose writer

    Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.

  • Add funds

    Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.

  • Ready

    Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.