To quickly introduce a study to a reader, authors will provide
an abstract as a brief overview. Abstracts should offer an accurate, concise,
and clear description of the heart of study as well as findings and results.
See Section 3.3 in the APA Publication Manual for additional
details on abstracts.
Instructions
Write a 200-word abstract for your research topic. Be sure to
include five appropriate keywords. Even though your study is not complete,
follow the procedure of an abstract to help place your vision for the study
into a conceptual summary.
Research Topic:
The
Empowered Administrator: A Training Program for Women in Leadership Roles in
Education
Rubric
below:
Abstract
Abstract
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose
Accomplishes
the goal of the assigned task using discipline-specific knowledge.
10 to >7.0 pts
Advanced
Comprehensively meets the
assignment goals, surpassing baseline expectations. The target audience is
addressed through communication reflecting thorough understanding of
audience exigencies and values. It applies, synthesizes, and/or expands
discipline-specific knowledge.
7 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
Adequately addresses minimum
assignment requirements. Adequately addresses the target audience.
Appropriately and sufficiently incorporates discipline-specific knowledge.
4 to >0 pts
Novice
Fails to meet one or more
assignment goals. Some relevant audiences are not sufficiently addressed or
writing is addressed to the wrong audience. Incompletely or incorrectly
applies discipline-specific knowledge.
10 pts
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
Ideas are
arranged logically, cohesively, and clearly.
10 to >7.0 pts
Advanced
Logical structure and
arrangement of thesis/ideas. Cohesive paragraphs that convincingly develop
the central argument/ ideas. Major and supporting ideas are presented
clearly. Smooth transitions between ideas at sentence, paragraph, and
section level.
7 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
Appropriate structure and
arrangement of thesis/ideas. Cohesive paragraphs that develop the central
argument/ideas. Major ideas are presented clearly. Adequate transitions
between ideas at sentence and paragraph level.
4 to >0 pts
Novice
Ineffective structure and
arrangement of thesis/ideas, lack of focus. Generally unified
arguments/ideas but with gaps in cohesion. The hierarchy of ideas is
unclear. Weak or ineffective transitions between ideas at sentence and
paragraph level.
10 pts
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary
Summary
and integration of high-quality sources to indicate the author’s claims.
10 to >7.0 pts
Advanced
Selects superior insight into
the claims of the author. Discussion of points provides clear and logical
support for reader clarity. Comprehensively and effectively represents the
resources. Applies source documentation conventions correctly (e.g., few
errors).
7 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
Selects relevant points to
support claims. Discussion of scholarship adequately represents the author.
Effectively integrates evidence. Applies some source documentation
conventions correctly (e.g., some errors in some conventions).
4 to >0 pts
Novice
Selects superior insight into
the claims of the author. Discussion of points provides clear and logical
support for reader clarity. Comprehensively and effectively represents the
resources. Applies source documentation conventions correctly (e.g., few
errors).
10 pts
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength
Concise
and clear representation of the article.
10 to >7.0 pts
Advanced
Seamless integration of relevant
information/knowledge into a coherent or new whole. A thorough discussion
of outcomes/findings and their significance. Insightful and concise
discussion of the article.
7 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
Vaguely discusses the central
claims of the article. Sufficient integration of relevant
information/knowledge, but may lack a unifying theme. Adequate discussion
of outcomes/findings without addressing the overall significance. Important
implications are noted but may not be thoroughly addressed.
4 to >0 pts
Novice
Fails to adhere to length
expectations. Irrelevant or poorly integrated information/knowledge.
Incomplete, or uneven, discussion of outcomes/findings. Only the most
obvious implications are noted.
10 pts
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage
Conventions
Format,
style, and specialized vocabulary that constitute standardized written
communication in a discipline and use of APA Style.
10 to >7.0 pts
Advanced
Clearly and concisely follows
writing style conventions. Applies discipline-specific terminology
correctly and consistently. Supporting data and visuals are correct and
appropriate. Mechanics (grammar, syntax, punctuation, spelling) follow the
rules of Standard English and adhere to APA Style.
7 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
Mostly follows writing style
conventions. Mostly applies discipline-specific terminology correctly.
Supporting data and visuals are generally correct and appropriate.
Mechanics (grammar, syntax, punctuation, spelling) follow rules of Standard
English and adhere to APA Style.
4 to >0 pts
Novice
Inconsistently follows writing
style conventions. Insufficiently or incorrectly applies
discipline-specific terminology. Supporting data and visuals are absent,
extraneous, or incorrectly presented. Mechanics (grammar, syntax,
punctuation, spelling) follow the rules of Standard English and adhere to
APA Style.
Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.
Choose writer
Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.
Add funds
Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.
Ready
Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.