After first listing the steps to assessing either kind of hazard, and looking for common traits, discuss whether this oscillating focus the best way to address the hazards we face? If not, how would you recommend that it be done?
you’ve seen how governments (at all levels — national, state, and local) have oscillated for decades between a primary focus on natural hazards (e.g., earthquakes/hurricanes) or man-made ones (e.g., terrorism), thereby ignoring the other kind of hazard while doing so.
The discussion question is this: After first listing the steps to assessing either kind of hazard, and looking for common traits, discuss whether this oscillating focus (primarily looking at natural hazards, or primarily looking at man-made hazards) the best way to address the hazards we face? If not, how would you recommend that it be done? Keep in mind that competing budget pressures means that there isn’t funding available to constantly address ALL of the hazard types that Americans face.
Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!
How our paper writing service works
It's very simple!
-
Fill out the order form
Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.
-
Choose writer
Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.
-
Add funds
Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.
-
Ready
Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.