Background
Throughout the week, you began to learn about the different types of laws and delved into the steps of a lawsuit. You will apply these learnings within three parts of this week’s assignment. In part one, you will be asked to compare the differences between two types of law, while in part two, you will classify laws as either substantive or procedural. In the third part of this assignment, you will examine a real-world case study and the steps in a lawsuit.
Instructions
Answer the following questions:
Explain the difference between common law and statutory law.
Associate the following laws with either substantive or procedural law and provide an explanation of how you came to this decision:
A law that requires public schools to hold a hearing before a student is expelled.
A law that establishes a maximum interest rate for credit transactions at 24%.
A law that provides employee leave for the birth or adoption of a child for up to 12 weeks.
A law that requires the county assessor to send four notices of taxes due and owing before a lien can be filed (attached) to the property.
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) charges the National Marine Fisheries Service (a federal agency) with the duty to “ensure” that any proposed action by the council does not “jeopardize” any threatened or endangered species. The Steller sea lion is on the list of endangered species. The agency developed a North Pacific marine fishery plan that permitted a significant harvest of fish by commercial fisheries in the area. Greenpeace, an environmental group, challenged the agency on the grounds that the plan was not based on a sufficient number of biological studies on the impact of the allowed fishing on the Steller sea lion. Greenpeace’s biologic opinion concluded that the fishery plan would reduce the level of food for the sea lions by about 40% to 60% if the juvenile fish were not counted in that figure. Greenpeace’s expert maintained that counting juvenile fish was misleading because they were not capable of reproducing and the government agency’s figure was, as a result, much lower at 22% [Greenpeace, American Oceans Campaign v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 237 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (W.D. Wash.)]. What would Greenpeace need to show to be successful in challenging the agency’s fishery plan? What would be their next step(s)? Provide a rationale or explain how you came to this determination.
Your paper should be a minimum of 2 pages, double-spaced, not including the reference page, and contain APA citations.