Write the essay based on this outline:
I. Introduction
A. Background Information
1. Overview of public health law and its significance.
2. Introduction to the intersection of disability rights and public health.
B. Research Question
– Proposed research question: “Do public health laws adequately consider the rights and needs of individuals with disabilities, and how can these laws be ethically justified?”
II. Thesis Statement
A. Thesis
– “Public health laws often overlook the unique rights and needs of individuals with disabilities, leading to ethical concerns regarding their autonomy and access to care.”
III. Counterargument
A. Presentation of Counterarguments
1. Counterargument 1: Public health laws are designed to protect the greater good, including vulnerable populations.
2. Counterargument 2: Existing laws incorporate provisions for individuals with disabilities.
3. Counterargument 3: Ethical frameworks in public health prioritize collective health outcomes.
B. Importance of Addressing Counter Arguments
– Explanation of why it is crucial to examine these counterarguments to strengthen the overall argument.
IV. Argument
A. Rebuttal to Counter Arguments
1. Argument against Counterargument 1: The greater good often marginalized individuals with disabilities.
2. Argument against Counterargument 2: Provisions are often insufficient and lack enforcement.
3. Argument against Counterargument 3: Collective health frameworks can lead to ethical quandaries for individual autonomy.
B. Scaffolding the Argument
1. Step 1: Ethical implications of marginalizing individuals with disabilities in public health policies.
2. Step 2: Analysis of case studies demonstrating the impact of public health laws on individuals with disabilities.
3. Step 3: Recommendations for creating more inclusive public health laws.
V. Literature Review
A. Overview of Relevant Literature
1. Summary of findings from Bobinski, Mark, and Orentlicher work on bioethics and public health law.
2. Discussion of Cohen, Daniels, and Eyal’s insights on disability rights in health law.
3. Insights from Joly and Knoppers on medical ethics related to public health.
B. Literature that Challenges Thesis
1. Brief overview of literature presenting opposing viewpoints.
2. Analysis of the credibility and relevance of these sources.
VI. Conclusion
A. Summary of Key Points
– Recap of the thesis, counter arguments, and supporting arguments.
B. Implications of Findings
– Discussion of the broader implications for ethics, law, and public health policy.
C. Suggestions for Future Research
– Areas for further investigation, such as exploring international approaches to public health laws concerning disability.
VII. References
– Bobinski, M. A., Mark, H. P., & Orentlicher, D. (2018). Bioethics and public health law (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
– Cohen, I. G., Daniels, N., & Eyal, N. (Eds.). (2020). Disability, health, law, and bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
– Joly, Y., & Knoppers, B. M. (Eds.). (2014). Routledge handbook of medical law and ethics.