Case Study: Navigating Diagnosis and Treatment Pathways in a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder

The purpose of this assignment is to draft and submit a complete, organized, detailed research paper in APA Style with sources cited and referenced accurately. You are expected to present a complete research paper that meets all of the original assignment criteria.

Signature Assignment

Your signature assignment for this course should be to submit a 4- to 6-page paper

After reviewing the case study details below, address the following:

  • Identify and explain the key neuroscientific, cognitive, and socioemotional factors contributing to Sarah’s challenges. 
  • Evaluate the implications of Sarah’s neurodevelopmental disorder for her academic performance, social interactions, and emotional well-being. 

Your paper or video should incorporate at least three scholarly sources, including your textbook. Your paper must be in APA Style and include in-text citations and a reference list.  You must submit a reference list for the video as well.

Video help: Getting Started with Panopto


Case study media link

Additional Case Study Details

Neuroscience: Sarah’s difficulties in language acquisition, social communication, and attention, alongside abnormalities in brain development, particularly in areas associated with language processing, attention, and emotional regulation, suggest underlying neurobiological factors. The decreased activity in the prefrontal cortex points to deficits in executive functioning and cognitive control. These findings highlight the intricate interplay between brain regions and their impact on cognitive and behavioral functioning.

Consciousness and Cognitive Functioning: Sarah’s level of consciousness appears intact, but her cognitive abilities are significantly affected. Her awareness may be compromised in social contexts due to difficulties in social communication. Attentional deficits and executive dysfunction likely contribute to her challenges in maintaining focus and expressing thoughts verbally. These factors collectively influence her level of consciousness and cognitive processing.

Thinking and Learning: Sarah’s cognitive processes are impaired, particularly in abstract thinking, problem-solving, and academic performance. These challenges align with the characteristics of neurodevelopmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder (ASD), impacting her ability to navigate academic tasks and everyday problem-solving situations effectively.

Development and Memory: Sarah’s developmental milestones are delayed, evident in her struggles with language acquisition and social communication skills since early childhood. Her memory processes may also be affected, with weaknesses in encoding, storage, and retrieval of information. However, she may possess strengths in certain mnemonic abilities, which could be explored further to support her learning and development.

Psychological Disorders: Based on Sarah’s presentation and assessments, she meets the criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This diagnosis encompasses her difficulties in social communication, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors. The impact of ASD on Sarah’s psychological well-being underscores the importance of early intervention and comprehensive support to address her complex needs effectively.

Motivation and Emotion: Sarah’s motivation levels appear low, possibly influenced by her difficulties in social interaction and academic performance. Additionally, her challenges with emotional regulation contribute to her withdrawn behavior and overall adjustment. Understanding these factors is crucial in developing tailored interventions to enhance her motivation and emotional well-being.

Attached are the Case Study requirements, Rubric, and the Annotated Bibliography that I already completed.

 (Video link to the Case Study of Sarah)

https://westcoastuniversity.h5p.com/content/1292236092251886428#h5pbookid=1292236092251886428&chapter=h5p-interactive-book-chapter-f86e866b-a8a2-4b99-a53a-a1f87c83760c§ion=0

PSYC_160_OL Signature Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content

60 to >53.4 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Fully addresses all elements of the assignment and provides detail and quality examples.

53.4 to >45.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations
Addresses most elements of the assignment. Few details or examples support the paper.

45 to >35.4 pts

Below Expectations
Addresses a few elements of the assignment; many are not addressed. Details and examples are missing.

35.4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
Most elements of the assignment are not addressed. There are no details or examples provided.
60 pts
Case Study

60 to >53.4 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues/problems in the case. Makes insightful, clear, and accurate connections to the key concepts of this week’s content. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

53.4 to >45.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the main issues/problems in the case. Makes mostly accurate connections to this week’s key concepts. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

45 to >35.4 pts

Below Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates acceptable understanding of some of the issues/problems in the case. Makes some accurate connections to this week’s key concepts. Response indicates some understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

35.4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not demonstrate an acceptable understanding of the issues and problems in the case. Does not make connections to this week’s key concepts. Response does not indicate understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
60 pts
Writing Mechanics

40 to >35.6 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations
The writing demonstrates sophisticated clarity and conciseness and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct with minimal to no errors.

35.6 to >30.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations
The writing is clear, concise, and well organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.

30 to >23.6 pts

Below Expectations
The writing lacks clarity, conciseness, or organization. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.

23.6 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
The writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.
40 pts
Sources and APA

40 to >35.6 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources without errors. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment. The required number of relevant audience-appropriate sources have been expertly cited and integrated into the content to support ideas.

35.6 to >30.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations
APA Style is used with few citation errors. Meets most length and formatting requirements of the assignment. Reputable audience-appropriate sources have been included but may not be well integrated. The source content minimally supports ideas.

30 to >23.6 pts

Below Expectations
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with many errors. Meets few length and formatting requirements of the assignment. At least one source is used but is not cited properly, is not reputable, or is inappropriate for the audience or topic. The source does not support ideas.

23.6 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not use APA style; there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet length or formatting requirements of the assignment. Sources are not provided.
40 pts
Total Points: 200

Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!

Whatever paper you need - we will help you write it

Get started

Starts at $9 /page

How our paper writing service works

It's very simple!

  • Fill out the order form

    Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.

  • Choose writer

    Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.

  • Add funds

    Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.

  • Ready

    Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.