Your paper should have three parts. (1) Explain the Consequence Argument for incompatiblism, then
(2) explain the classical compatiblist response to the argument, and (3) evaluate this response.
The evaluation section of your paper should not merely consist in saying you agree or disagree with an
argument or position, nor should it consist merely in repeating things the author says. You should offer
some independent reasons in favor or against the argument or position you are discussing—what
argument or position, nor should it consist merely in repeating things the author says. You should offer
some independent reasons in favor or against the argument or position you are discussing—what
reasons can you offer to think the conclusion is true or false.
Your paper should be approximately 1200 words (roughly 4 pages) in length. Please use 12 point Times
New Roman font, 1 inch margins, and double space your paper.
New Roman font, 1 inch margins, and double space your paper.
An excellent essay (a) answers the question(s) asked in the prompt, (b) does
so in a very clear, concise, and sufficiently thorough manner, (c) provides an accurate
interpretation of the person or people being discussed, (d) has good citation practices, and (e)
provides support for why the writer assesses a view a certain way (if such assessment is asked for).
so in a very clear, concise, and sufficiently thorough manner, (c) provides an accurate
interpretation of the person or people being discussed, (d) has good citation practices, and (e)
provides support for why the writer assesses a view a certain way (if such assessment is asked for).