My professor peer-reviewed my paper this is the respond i got
Majority of the content is comprehensive and consistent
with regard to purpose and clarity of thoughts. Most of key points are
addresses and well supported through logical arguments and refeersence some
responses are inadequate or do not address assignemt requirement,
Lauguage occasionally lacks clarity or includes some use of
jargon or conversational tone. The presentation of the majority of ideas rely
on varied sources sometimes the order of ideas depends closely on the original logical
flow of arugument or ideas for most parts but occasionally abrupt or choppy Transition
used to give some help to the reader linking one idea to next
Please use inctructor feedback to revise this document. This will be documented in new section called response to reviewer