Assignment:
Create a complete annotated
bibliography of 3 academic scholarly sources, which includes publication
details (proper MLA citation) and the annotation (summary of article’s main
argument). The 3 academic scholarly sources are:
1- “The Structure of Myth” from the text, Myth And Reality by Mircea Eliade.
2- “The
Hero & the God.”
from The Hero With A thousand
Faces by Joseph Campbell.
3- “The
Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives” by
William Bascom,
General
Criteria:
·
Citations must follow
proper MLA formatting.
·
Each Annotation must be
a minimum of 175 words (excluding citations
and quotes)
·
Plagiarized/AI work will
receive an automatic zero
·
Non scholarly sources
will receive an automatic zero, including but not limited to videos, .com,
Wikipedia
·
Do not use primary
sources (poems, stories, films, etc.) for annotations
Effective
Annotations (see example on syllabus) Review: Example of Annotated BibliographyLinks to an external site.
Use proper MLA citation and a detailed
reading of the source, covering the following:
·
Summarizes key points
(using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses);
·
Locates controversies or
“problems” raised by the articles; and
·
Evaluates the ways in
which this article is important and has helped the student to focus his/her
understanding.
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
|
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Research
|
|
65 pts
Outstanding
Annotations completely summarize
and evaluate the sources with the author’s main points.
|
55 pts
Very good
Annotations mostly summarize and
evaluate the sources with the author’s main points.
|
45 pts
Competent
Annotations somewhat summarize and
evaluate the sources with the author’s main points.
|
35 pts
Poor
Annotations minimally summarize
and evaluate the sources with the author’s main points.
|
0 pts
Failing
Annotations do not summarize and
evaluate the sources with the author’s main points.
|
|
65 pts
|
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality
|
|
20 pts
Outstanding
Throughout the whole work, the
writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in
grammar, spelling, and punctuation •logically organizes ideas
|
18 pts
Very good
Throughout most of the work, the
writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in
grammar, spelling, and punctuation •logically organizes ideas
|
15 pts
Competent
Throughout some of the work, the
writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in
grammar, spelling, and punctuation •logically organizes ideas
|
10 pts
Poor
Throughout little of the work, the
writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in
grammar, spelling, and punctuation •logically organizes ideas
|
0 pts
Failing
No effort
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference
|
|
15 pts
Outstanding
•in-text references are formatted
using MLA style •complete bibliographic information for sources using MLA
style is included •A minimum of 3 scholarly sources are used •Sources were
used from two different discussions
|
10 pts
Very good
•in-text references are used
•bibliographic information for sources using MLA style is included •A
minimum of 3 scholarly sources are used •Sources were used from two
different discussions
|
5 pts
Competent
•bibliographic information for
sources using MLA style is included •A minimum of 3 scholarly sources are
used •scholarly sources from discussions were used
|
3 pts
Poor
•bibliographic information for
sources is included •A minimum of 2 scholarly sources are used •scholarly
sources from discussions were used
|
0 pts
Failing
No effort
|
|
15 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|