Critical appraisal on Assessment of Risk Factors and Early Presentations of Parkinson Disease in Primary Care in a Diverse UK Population. JAMA Neurol. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):359-369. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0003. PMID: 35254398; PMCID: PMC8902684.

Use the casp checklist in your analysis. the mark scheme is included below. ensure to include at least 3 figures or diagrams from the research paper or as evidence to support a point.

Essay Plan: Critical Appraisal of “Assessment of Risk Factors and Early Presentations of Parkinson Disease in Primary Care in a Diverse UK Population”

  1. Introduction (Approx. 200 words)

    • Brief overview of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and its significance in public health.
    • Introduction to the chosen research paper and its relevance in assessing risk factors and early presentations of PD in a diverse UK population.
    • Statement of purpose: To critically appraise the methodology, findings, and implications of the study.
  2. Lay Summary (Approx. 200 words)

    • Simplified explanation of the study aims, methods, and key findings in layman’s terms.
    • Avoidance of scientific jargon and statistical terms.
    • Clear explanation of difficult concepts at an appropriate level for a non-scientific audience.
  3. Description of the Study (Approx. 300 words)

    • Detailed overview of the study design, including its setting, participants, and methods used for data collection and analysis.
    • Explanation of how the study assessed risk factors and early presentations of PD in primary care settings.
    • Clarification of key terms and concepts related to the study’s objectives.
  4. Appraisal of the Study (Approx. 1000 words)

    • Introduction to critical appraisal and explanation of the chosen framework (CASP checklist for case-control studies).
    • Detailed evaluation of study methodology, addressing aspects such as selection bias, confounding variables, and statistical analysis.
    • Discussion of strengths and weaknesses of the study design and execution.
    • Critical analysis of the validity and reliability of study findings.
    • Assessment of the study’s contribution to existing literature and its implications for clinical practice and further research.
  5. Relevance, Future Work, Conclusions, and Current Wider Literature Context (Approx. 400 words)

    • Critical assessment of the study’s conclusions, including their novelty, relevance, and implications for public health.
    • Discussion of how the study adds to the existing body of literature on PD risk factors and early presentations.
    • Identification of areas for future research and improvements in clinical practice based on study findings.
    • Reference to relevant wider literature to contextualize the study within the current research landscape.

Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!

Whatever paper you need - we will help you write it

Get started

Starts at $9 /page

How our paper writing service works

It's very simple!

  • Fill out the order form

    Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.

  • Choose writer

    Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.

  • Add funds

    Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.

  • Ready

    Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.