Below you will find 4 references out of the 4 references pick two and fill out the chart i have attached to this order.
References
Gevaert, Adams, Bahls, Bowen, Cornelissen,
Dörr, & Kränkel, (2020). Towards a personalized approach in exercise-based cardiovascular
rehabilitation: How can translational research help? A ‘call to action ‘ from
the Section on Secondary Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the European
Association of Preventive Cardiology. European Journal of Preventive
Cardiology, 27(13), 1369-1385.
Izquierdo, Merchant, Morley, Anker, Aprahamian,
Arai, & Singh, (2021). International exercise recommendations in older
adults (ICFSR): expert consensus guidelines. The journal of nutrition,
health & aging, 25(7), 824-853.
Hanssen, Boardman, Deiseroth, Moholdt,
Simonenko, Kränkel, & Leeson, (2022). Personalized exercise prescription in
preventing and treating arterial hypertension: a Consensus Document from the
European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and the ESC Council on
Hypertension. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 29(1),
205-215.
Merchant, Morley, & Izquierdo, (2021).
Exercise, aging, and frailty: guidelines for increasing function. The
journal of nutrition, health & aging, 25, 405-409.
- i have attached the template that has to be completed as well as the original paper this assignment is based on.
Assignment 2: Evaluate the
Evidence (18 points)
Using a two-step process,
students will evaluate and synthesize the external evidence results from
two (2) of the strongest external studies retrieved during the search of the
literature that supports the intervention of the PICOT question formulated in
Week 1. These are the studies that answer the chosen PICOT question and
directly relate to the chosen intervention. The studies must be within the discipline of nursing and not
medicine.
Assignment Criteria:
Develop
a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:
1. Complete the Evaluation Table Template found in the Week 3 module with the
results from the two strongest external evidence studies.
a. Pages 119-145 (5th edition) provides detailed
samples of what type of information should be included in each category of the Evaluation Table. Also, Section 6.1,
Pages 256-258 of the text, provides a detailed narrative of what information
needs to be included in each category of the Evaluation Table.
2. Determine the strength of each of the two (2)
studies using the rating system in Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (5th edition)
page 21 and add the Level for each
study to the evaluation table.
a. The information on the evaluation table
should be in bulleted format, not sentences.
3. Include a legend on the evaluation table.
4. Place the completed Evaluation Table as an appendix.
5. Write a one-page narrative that analyzes how
the evidence from the two studies supports the intervention of the PICOT
question. If the evidence does not support the intervention, describe what
would be the next step in the evidence-based practice process.
6. Include a brief introduction, purpose
statement and conclusion.
7. Level 1 headings required.
8. Include a title page, reference page and
appendix.
9.
Write
the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’)
and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In
addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be
used.
10. APA 7th edition format is required.
11. The assignment does not need to be submitted
to Turnitin.
12. Submit the assignment and copies of both
studies (PDFs) by the posted due date.