use these sources if possible:
References/annotations:
(not in alphabetical order yet, will be on final report)
Clements, C.John, et al. “Technologies
that make administration of vaccines safer.” Vaccine, vol. 22, no.
15–16, May 2004, pp. 2054–2058, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.008.
·
This
article explains the advances in technology and how they promote improvement
for safety vaccine administration. The authors reference the benefits of these
technologies with a focus in risk reduction in needle related infections.
Omer, Saad B., et al. “Vaccine refusal, mandatory
immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases.” New England
Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 19, 7 May 2009, pp. 1981–1988,
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0806477.
·
This
article uses the Justice Principal ethic to explain vaccine refusal. Its focus
is that of health disparities with mandatory immunization advocating public
health.
Nihlén Fahlquist, Jessica. “Vaccine
hesitancy and trust. ethical aspects of risk communication.” Scandinavian
Journal of Public Health, vol. 46, no. 2, 28 Aug. 2017, pp. 182–188,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817727162.
·
In this article the author uses communication to influence vaccine
hesitant individuals to change their minds. This is a form of the Beneficence
Principle that promotes the best well-being of others and prevents harm.
Paterson, Pauline, et al. “Vaccine
hesitancy and healthcare providers.” Vaccine, vol. 34, no. 52, Dec.
2016, pp. 6700–6706, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.042.
·
The authors of this article reference concerned from vaccine hesitancy
and its relationship with autonomy versus public health. It discuses ethical
dilemmas for healthcare providers while maintain respect for their patients
choice and promoting vaccination.
Van Hooste, Wim Leo, and Micheline
Bekaert. “To be or not to be vaccinated? the ethical aspects of influenza
vaccination among healthcare workers.” International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 16, no. 20, 18 Oct. 2019, p.
3981, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203981.
·
This article argues the ethics of influenza vaccination in healthcare
workers as an obligation of morals to protect patients. One of the main points
is the do no harm stance that correlates with the beneficence principle.
Troiano, G., and A. Nardi. “Vaccine
hesitancy in the era of COVID-19.” Public Health, vol. 194, May 2021,
pp. 245–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025.
·
The authors dive into the phenomena that was COVID-19 vaccine hesitation.
Although it does not talk about many ethical issues and focuses on
misinformation and mistrust of the public, the article sill is a good source
for expanding on vaccination hesitancy. An example is that of social media.
Vaz, Olivia M., et al. “Mandatory
vaccination in Europe.” Pediatrics, vol. 145, no. 2, 1 Feb. 2020,
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-0620.
In
this article, the authors mention ethical implication of mandatory vaccination
in Europe. They write about ethical considerations such as public health
benefits. This article will give insight as how other countries dealt with
mandatory vaccination and the effects it had on the European nations.