got the topic from pro cons.org
Instructions: Submit the Annotated Bibliography rough draft to this assignment link. Although you don’t have to submit the full draft, it should at least contain the scope and 3 of the 5 entries.
Additional criteria:
1. MLA style
2. Times New Roman, size 12 font
3. Mostly academic sources
4. A scope, bibliographic info, and an annotation that includes: a summary, degree of advocacy, author’s credibility, publication reliability, and usefulness statement
5. Upload this same rough draft to the Brainfuse Online Writing Lab for feedback. (I had to this the other day but I didn’t but I’m trying to do the final draft.
Your Annotated Bibliography should include MLA formatting and documentation and AT LEAST FIVE (5) reputable, academic sources. Each entry in your Annotated Bibliography should do the following:
Include a correctly formatted MLA reference source citation.
Include an annotation of AT LEAST 200 words that…
summarizes the source
evaluates the source.
Rubric
Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bibliography
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Complete Bibliographic Information
30 pts
Full Marks
The bibliographic information is complete and contains no major errors in citations.
27 pts
90 A
The bibliographic information is complete and contains only 1-2 major errors in citations.
24 pts
80 B
The bibliographic information is complete contains 3-4 major errors in citations.
21 pts
70 C
The bibliographic information is mostly complete and contains 4-5 major errors in citations.
18 pts
60 D
The bibliographic information is somewhat complete and contains 6-8 major errors in citations.
15 pts
50 F
The bibliographic information is incomplete and has 9 or more major errors in citations.
7.5 pts
25 F
The bibliographic information is incomplete and has 10 or more errors in citations.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Source Selection Quality
20 pts
Full Marks
The annotated bibliography contains the required number of excellent quality and relevant secondary and/or primary sources.
18 pts
90 A
The annotated bibliography contains the required number of high quality and relevant secondary and/or primary sources.
16 pts
80 B
The annotated bibliography contains at least 80% of the required number of good quality and relevant secondary and/or primary sources.
14 pts
70 C
The annotated bibliography contains at least 70% of the required number of satisfactory quality and relevant secondary and/or primary sources.
12 pts
60 D
The annotated bibliography contains at least 60% of the required number of adequate quality and relevant secondary and/or primary sources.
10 pts
50 F
The annotated bibliography contains 50% or fewer of the required number of adequate quality and relevant secondary and/or primary sources.
5 pts
25 F
The annotated bibliography contains no sources primary and/or secondary sources of quality and relevance.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome A Concise Description of the Work
20 pts
Full Marks
Each annotation contains a carefully concise, descriptive, and objective paraphrase or summary of the work.
18 pts
90 A
Each annotation contains a relatively concise, descriptive, and objective paraphrase or summary of the work.
16 pts
80 B
Most annotations contain a concise and descriptive paraphrase or summary of the work.
14 pts
70 C
Most annotations contain an adequate paraphrase or summary of the work.
12 pts
60 D
Most annotations contain a wordy and/or unorganized paraphrase or summary of the work.
10 pts
50 F
Each annotation contains a wordy and/ or unorganized paraphrase or summary of the work.
5 pts
25 F
Each annotation contains a poorly written and unorganized paraphrase or summary of the work.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relevant Commentary
20 pts
Full Marks
Each annotation contains excellent source commentary that is relevant to the writer’s purpose and audience.
18 pts
90 A
Each annotation contains satisfactory source commentary that is relevant to the writer’s purpose and audience.
16 pts
80 B
Most annotations contain adequate source commentary that is relevant to the writer’s purpose and audience.
14 pts
70 C
Most annotations contain rudimentary source commentary that is somewhat relevant to the writer’s purpose and audience.
12 pts
60 D
Each annotation contains source commentary that is irrelevant to the author’s purpose and audience.
10 pts
50 F
Each annotation contains poorly written source commentary that is irrelevant to the author’s purpose and audience.
5 pts
25 F
Each annotation contains incoherent source commentary.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Additional Formatting Requirements
10 pts
Full Marks
The annotated bibliography adheres to all additional formatting requirements such as alphabetizing, margins, title page (if required), title, etc. with no errors.
9 pts
90 A
The annotated bibliography adheres to all additional formatting requirements such as alphabetizing, margins, title page (if required), title, etc. with 1-2 errors.
8 pts
80 B
The annotated bibliography adheres to most additional formatting requirements such as alphabetizing, margins, title page (if required), title, etc. with 3-4 errors.