My PICO question is
In low birth weight/pre-term neonates in health facilities,
is skin-to-skin contact immediately after birth more effective than a radiant warmer
in preventing hypothermia?
Create a scholarly literature-review research paper focused on the importance of nutrition, maternity health, evidence-based care, and incorporating genetic and genomic information into a thorough evaluation of the pregnant patient and fetus to include:
- A summary of assessment components for evaluating maternal and fetal health status at initial and follow-up intrapartum visits (include EDB using Naegele’s rule)
- Components of a thorough health history (including family history, genetics, and environment)
- Importance of collaboration with the members of the healthcare field for better understanding of daily patient care and improvement of patient care outcomes
- Predictive and protective factors for maternal, fetal, and family health
- Anatomical and physiological changes expected with advancing pregnancy and preterm, term, and post-term neonates
- Thorough understanding of patient care outcomes and possible improvements, quality of patient care, and cost- effective care
- Benefits that knowledge of genetic and genomic information provides for mother, baby, and family health maintenance and promotion in the future
NURC2463 Core
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Topic/PICO question is submitted on or before due date
|
|
5 pts
|
||
|
Abstract – basically a summary of the paper, including identification of the problem/topic and what was learned from the literature review (no references)
|
|
5 pts
|
||
|
Intro – concise introduction to the PICO question/problem/topic/issue and why it is important to the profession of nursing; may introduce themes identified in the literature review
|
|
10 pts
|
||
|
Body: Summarizes assessment components for evaluating maternal & fetal health status at initial & follow-up intrapartum visits (include EDB using Naegele’s rule)
|
|
10 pts
|
||
|
Body: Identifies components of a thorough health history (including family history, genetics, and environment)
|
|
10 pts
|
||
|
Body: Describes the importance of collaboration w/ members of the healthcare field for better understanding of daily pt care & improvement of pt care outcomes
|
|
5 pts
|
||
|
Body: Explains predictive & protective factors for maternal, fetal, & family health
|
|
5 pts
|
||
|
Body: Examines anatomical & physiological changes expected w/advancing pregnancy & preterm, term, & post-term neonates
|
|
5 pts
|
||
|
Body: Exhibits a thorough understanding of pt care outcomes & possible improvements, quality of pt care, & cost- effective care
|
|
10 pts
|
||
|
Body: Explains benefits that knowledge of genetic & genomic information provides for mother, baby, & family health maintenance & promotion in the future
|
|
10 pts
|
||
|
Conclusion/Recommendations: synthesizes what was learned from the literature review; what questions or areas of concern were identified? Did the review of literature indicate areas of the topic/question/issue where further research is needed?
|
|
10 pts
|
||
|
Mechanics: Minimum 8 pages (excluding title, abstract, and references) with Minimum 8 sources (at least five sources coming from peer reviewed journals )
|
|
5 pts
|
||
|
Mechanics: Follows APA Guidelines, including proper citation of sources throughout the paper & proper citation on references page, running heads, line spacing, margins, & page numbers
|
|
5 pts
|
||
|
Mechanics: Writing is concise and coherent with minimal spelling and grammatical errors
|
|
5 pts
|
||
|
Total Points: 100
|