Marina Oshana argues that no woman can be truly happy in a patriarchic society (a society hierarchically organized to favor men).

Begin your paper with an exposition of one argument an author gives in
support of one of their claims. This should take up between ½ to 2/3 of
your paper
 About ½ to 1/3 of your paper must be your original thoughts
 You can either agree or disagree with either author
 You can draw on other authors, but if you merely describe their views
without developing them in your own way then that counts as exposition
 Remember, to construct an objection to an author. If you agree with an
author, then you might structure your paper so that you reply to the
objection you have created. If you disagree with an author, then you can
explain why replies to your objection fail.
• Include your name, student number, TA’s name and tutorial number (ex.
D. 113)
• Word count must be on the paper (you needn’t count your name,
references, etc.) along with your name, student number
• Skip lines, and use a 12 point font.                                                                                                                                                                    the paper is on this question is Marina Oshana argues that no woman can be truly happy in a
patriarchic society (a society hierarchically organized to favour men).
Ranjoo Heer argues that women can be truly happy in patriarchic (a
society hierarchically organized to favour men) religious societies. Do
you agree with Oshana, Heer, or with neither author? Why or why not.
(There are many ways you can tackle the question above. One
thing you should not do is attempt to summarize the arguments of both
Oshana and Heer since that will leave you no space to develop your own
view.)                                                                                                              Policy on Academic Honesty
All papers require footnotes with page references (when possible) for all
attributions + a bibliography. (When your source comprises a selection I’ve
placed in a Word document, then you should cite the page number from the Word
document.) You are responsible for every word your paper contains: meaning, that
you must be able to explain the role of that word or phrase in your argument. I
reserve the right to give you an oral examination of the contents of your paper and
substitute your grade on that exam for your paper grade. I will randomly ask
students to meet with me to explain their papers. I encourage you to keep your
rough notes.