Use the following prompt and answer it. The answer to the prompt must be 4-5 paragraphs. It should include one paragraph with a clear and precise rearticulation of the prompt. The thesis is the claim that you will be defending in your response. This should be followed by 3-4 paragraphs containing at least one direct quote or paraphrase from the primary materials of the course, and at least 3-5 additional sentences that analyze the direct quotes and explain how the evidence supports your response to the prompt.
Discuss the central differences between Utilitarianism and Kant’s
deontological ethics by examining their respective approaches to moral
decision-making. How do these theories differ in their understanding of what
makes an action morally right or wrong? Consider the role of consequences in
Utilitarianism and the principle of duty in Kant’s ethics. In your discussion,
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of relying on outcomes versus intentions to
determine ethical behavior.
Attached are the course materials mentioned in the instructions. You will probably not use all of it, but I included it just in case.