The political leadership of Alexander the Great is a compelling subject that warrants thorough investigation, particularly in light of his contrasting governance style compared to the Persian Empire. In my opinion, the research question—How did Alexander the Great’s political leadership and administrative strategies differ from those of the Persian Empire, and what impact did these differences have on the governance of his diverse empire?—is crucial for understanding the complexities of leadership in a multicultural context.
To support this analysis, I will draw upon a range of scholarly sources, including Arrian’s Anabasis of Alexander, which provides firsthand accounts of Alexander’s campaigns and leadership style, and modern works by historians such as Paul Cartledge and Peter Green, who offer critical insights into his political strategies and their implications. These sources will be instrumental in framing my argument and providing a nuanced understanding of Alexander’s governance.
In my research, I will discuss key events that exemplify Alexander’s leadership, such as his founding of cities like Alexandria, which served as cultural and administrative hubs, and his controversial decision to encourage his soldiers to marry Persian wives, a move that aimed to integrate the Macedonian and Persian cultures. Additionally, I will explore instances of negative leadership, particularly his increasingly autocratic tendencies and the paranoia that led to the execution of loyal generals, such as Cleitus. These examples will illustrate the duality of Alexander’s leadership—his ability to inspire loyalty and his propensity for ruthless decision-making, which ultimately shaped the legacy of his rule.