Pros and cons of Person-First Language (PFL) and Identity-First Language (IFL) while using supporting evidenceto back up your claims.
Paper Type:
- Comparative Analysis: Compares and contrasts PFL and IFL, discussing their ethical implications.
- Argumentative Paper: Presents a balanced view but may argue for one approach based on evidence.
Structure:
- Introduction
- Define PFL and IFL
- Explain why this topic is ethically relevant
- State your thesis (e.g., “Both PFL and IFL have ethical implications, and their preference varies based on cultural, professional, and individual factors.”)
- Pros and Cons of PFL
- Pros: Preferred by most professional organizations, aligns with legislative guidelines, emphasizes personhood over disability.
- Cons: Some argue it unintentionally separates identity from disability, can be seen as dismissive of disability pride.
- Pros and Cons of IFL
- Pros: Many disabled individuals prefer it, promotes disability pride, recognizes disability as an inherent part of identity.
- Cons: Some professionals and organizations see it as potentially stigmatizing, cultural preferences vary.
- Supporting Evidence
- Cite research studies, professional organizations’ stance (e.g., APA, ASHA), and perspectives from disabled individuals.
- Discuss cultural influences on language preference.
- Conclusion
- Summarize key points
- Discuss the ethical balance of respecting individual preferences
- Offer recommendations (e.g., using both approaches based on individual choice)