Responsibility in Risk Assessment Management (RARs) on person Mental-Data-Privacy-Consent (MDPC) with intelligent neuroprostheses—Brain-Computer Interface (BCIs)—an Artificial Intelligent (AI)

1. Edit  for organic correctness where appropriate without harming the intergral work:

   Important: Organize Table of Content and Fill in missing Reference in BIBLIOGRAPHY intelligently to reflect sample shared article (title: “SAMPLE OF THESIS BIBILOGRAPHY ORGANIZATION.pdf” attached) for perfect reference

2. Improve and Structure the Sub-Table and organize for Subheading with sample shared Doctoral work title: (“MODEL OF NEUROPRIVACY Yusifova_Laman.pdf” – attached)

   • Reorganize for Better Flow: Ensure that the tables are logically structured and easy to navigate. For instance, a table detailing RARs could be organized according to different risk categories, such as legal, technical, and ethical risks.
   • Enhance Readability: Use clear headings and subheadings in the tables. Include explanatory notes or legends where necessary to make the tables more accessible to readers unfamiliar with the topic​​.

3. Improve Sub-title Subjects where appropriate:

   • Ensure Relevance and Clarity: Subtitles should accurately reflect the content of each section and guide the reader through the document effectively. Each subtitle should introduce a distinct aspect of neurolaw, neuroprivacy, or BCI technology.
   • Use Engaging and Descriptive Titles: Subtitles should be engaging and descriptive, providing a clear indication of what the reader can expect in each section (if deem appropriate)​​.

4. Check for Plagiarism:

   • Originality Check: Check specifically page 77 title:  Depth of RARs Pyramid & Privacy Application Process for rewording if neccessary and compare wording to original content attachment of “MODEL OF NEUROPRIVACY Yusifova_Laman.pdf” – to ensure that all sources are properly cited and that the content does not inadvertently mirror existing publications in that document. This is especially important for this document dealing with legal and ethical issues​​.
   • Check for repeating Verbiage and Edit for appropriate Conclusion :
   • Suggest and delete repeated sentences and Paragraphs, wordings and unnecessary verbiage. 
   • Reorganize graphs and heat-maps for appropriate and logical consistency to statement structure
   • Create interview Chart: Create a chart for interview section using the sample chart and works attached use the 2-interview sample added authors reference and reference the authors that were interviewed (see interview transcription) and use supporting statement on the subject from each interviewee to support the NEUROPRIVACY purpose using: The Role and Limits of Principles in AI Ethics: Towards a Focus on Tensions (Whittlestone, et al, 2019, p. 196)  approach because the authors is appropriate to the own research thesis, that “…while principles are important, they are not in themselves enough to ensure society can reap the benefits and mitigate the risks of new technologies.” 
   • And that to improve the quality of data and efficiency of services vs. respecting privacy and autonomy of individuals. (Ibid, p. 199)
   • Add new 2/3 block quotes from the authors:Additionally use new “block quotes” from each authors to reference and support academically the qualitatively (namely Bryman, 2012, p. 209, Atkison & Coffey (2004), (Bowen, 2009)) and the usage of the research as in the sample attachment.

Please not that focus is must:The thesis will have clarity and depth with appropriate editing and focus to become a more comprehensive and accessible resource on the intricate subjects of neurolaw and neuroprivacy as they relate to BCIs.

Glossary

+CREATE GLOSSARY, ABBREVIATIONS AND FIGURES LISTS

Here to answer any question.