Please view attached files: a review paper to gain a good background of the species we held experiments on. View file named “Dissertation_brief_” for marking crtieria. View “Methodology-description-research_project” to gain an insight of how the methodology worked. View “failed_introduction_writing_piece-but_with_constructive_feedbacks_offered_could_be_used_for_reference_learning_what_to_and_what_not_to” a failed introdcution section that we could learn something from-especially look at the constructive feedback in the end. Please view the file “Introduction_Light_Spectra_on_fish_CORE_ideas_some_references”, to see how I would like to structure the Introduction section; a core information paragraph; A breakdown of what could be added to expand on the original core message paragraph; and my attempt to construct expanded paragraphs for each section within introduction-based on the core messages, with the help of AI-which could be potentially used as a reference to what to discuss. (Disclaimer: Many of the citations in the paragraphs were either inaccurately attributed, derived from unrelated species (e.g., non-stickleback studies used to support stickleback-specific claims), or could not be verified in the scientific literature.
During the process of rewriting, please maintain the core structure and ideas we’ve developed — especially those related to light spectra, behavioural assays, and visual ecology. However, I kindly ask that you independently locate and cross-verify all scientific sources you intend to cite. Where no relevant peer-reviewed reference exists to support a particular claim, it’s preferable to revise, reframe, or omit that point rather than rely on weak or incorrect citations. The credibility of the final manuscript depends heavily on robust sourcing.