“Social media has become an integral part of modern society, shaping communication, and relationships, and concerns exist regarding privacy, mental health impacts, and the spread of misinformation
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Question and Focus
10to >8.0pts
Excellent
Clear, well-defined research question that aligns with the topic and provides a strong focus for the paper.
8to >4.0pts
Good
Clearly stated research question that fits the topic and provides a reasonable focus.
4to >2.0pts
Fair
Research question is stated but may lack clarity or alignment with the topic.
2to >0pts
Needs Improvement
Unclear or missing research question, lacking focus on the topic.
10pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
15to >12.0pts
Excellent
Comprehensive review of relevant literature demonstrating an understanding of the field and its context. Includes credible research from the Valencia Library database collection.
12to >8.0pts
Good
Thorough review of literature that contextualizes the research and identifies key sources. Includes some credible research from the Valencia Library database collection
8to >2.0pts
Fair
Adequate literature review, but may lack depth in critical analysis or relevant sources.
2to >0pts
Needs Improvement
Limited literature review with gaps in understanding or relevance.
15pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis & Interpretation
10to >6.0pts
Excellent
Thorough analysis of data with insightful interpretation that effectively addresses the research question.
6to >4.0pts
Good
Adequate analysis of data with relevant interpretation related to the research question.
4to >2.0pts
Fair
Basic analysis of data, but interpretation may lack depth or direct relevance to the research question.
2to >0pts
Needs Improvement
Limited analysis and interpretation, not effectively addressing the research question.
10pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults and Analysis
15to >8.0pts
Excellent
Clear presentation of results with insightful discussion connecting findings to the research question.
8to >5.0pts
Good
Clear presentation of results with discussion that connects findings to the research question.
5to >2.0pts
Fair
Adequate presentation of results, but discussion may lack clarity or depth in relating findings to the research question.
2to >0pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of results and discussion may be unclear or lack relevance to the research question.
15pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality and Clarity
10to >6.0pts
Excellent
Exceptional writing quality with sophisticated organization, coherence, and effective communication.
6to >4.0pts
Good
Good writing quality with overall clarity, but there may be occasional lapses in organization or expression.
4to >2.0pts
Fair
Writing quality is somewhat inconsistent, impacting clarity and overall effectiveness.
2to >0pts
Needs Improvement
Poor writing quality with significant issues in organization, coherence, and clarity.
10pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginal Contribution and Insights
10to >6.0pts
Excellent
Paper offers original insights that contribute to the field, showcasing critical thinking.
6to >4.0pts
Good
Paper presents original insights that contribute to the field, reflecting thoughtful analysis.
4to >2.0pts
Fair
Paper provides some original insights, but they may lack depth or significant contribution.
2to >0pts
Needs Improvement
Paper lacks original insights or meaningful contribution to the field.
10pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations and References
10to >6.0pts
Excellent
Accurate and consistent citations throughout, properly attributing sources.
6to >4.0pts
Good
Mostly accurate citations with some minor inconsistencies.
4to >2.0pts
Fair
Citations are generally present, but there may be notable errors or inconsistencies.
2to >0pts
Needs Improvement
Citations are missing, inaccurate, or inconsistent, impacting credibility.
10pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Presentation and Formatting
10to >6.0pts
Excellent
Outstanding presentation with meticulous formatting, adhering to appropriate style guidelines.
6to >4.0pts
Good
Good presentation and formatting, with minor deviations from appropriate style guidelines.
4to >2.0pts
Fair
Presentation and formatting are somewhat inconsistent or deviate from appropriate style guidelines.
2to >0pts
Needs Improvement
Poor presentation and formatting, significantly deviating from appropriate style guidelines.
10pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Assessment and Contribution
10to >6.0pts
Excellent
Paper effectively demonstrates research and analysis skills, and is well-organized and coherent.
6to >4.0pts
Good
Paper demonstrates satisfactory research and analysis skills with reasonable organization and coherence.
4to >2.0pts
Fair
Paper shows limited evidence of research and analysis skills, with some issues in organization and coherence.
2to >0pts
Needs Improvement
Paper lacks evidence of research and analysis skills, with poor organization and coheren
Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!
Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.
Choose writer
Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.
Add funds
Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.
Ready
Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.