This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
|
5 pts
Exceptional
Detailed introduction where the paper clearly identifies a healthcare topic identified in the SWOT Analysis, and a well-developed purpose statement.
|
4 pts
Effective
Acceptable introduction where the paper identifies a healthcare topic in the identified SWOT Analysis. A purpose statement is provided.
|
3 pts
Developing
Underdeveloped introduction where the paper does not clearly identify the healthcare topic in the identified SWOT Analysis. An underdeveloped purpose statement is provided.
|
0 pts
Unacceptable
No introduction was provided. OR Topic selected was not approved by the instructor. OR No assignment submitted.
|
|
5 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclusion of Three Peer-Reviewed Articles
|
30 pts
Exceptional
Detailed summaries of the three articles where the paper clearly describes the type of study/design, purpose, sample, methods, and results for each article. In-text citations are provided from each article. All three articles are scholarly, peer-reviewed articles, and dated within 5 years.
|
26 pts
Effective
Effective summaries of the three articles were the paper aptly describes the type of study/design, purpose, sample, methods, and results for each article. In-text citations are provided from each article. All three articles are scholarly, peer-reviewed articles, and dated within 5 years.
|
18 pts
Developing
Underdeveloped summaries of the three articles with minimal article content provided. OR Effective summaries of one to two articles. OR At least one article is not scholarly/peer-reviewed and/or dated within 5 years.
|
0 pts
Unacceptable
No article summaries were provided. OR No assignment submitted.
|
|
30 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of the Evidence
|
20 pts
Exceptional
Detailed analysis (compare and contrast) of the three scholarly/peer-reviewed articles. In-text citations are provided for each article.
|
17 pts
Effective
Effective analysis with some analysis (compare and contrast) of the three articles. In-text citations are provided for each article.
|
15 pts
Developing
Underdeveloped analysis (compare and contrast) of the three articles with minimal article content. OR Effective analysis of one to two articles. OR At least one article is not scholarly/peer-reviewed and/or dated within five years.
|
0 pts
Unacceptable
No article analysis was provided. OR No assignment submitted.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact of Healthcare Delivery
|
20 pts
Exceptional
Detailed discussion regarding how the identified issue impacts healthcare access, cost, and collaboration with other disciplines.
|
17 pts
Effective
Effective discussion of 2 of the 3 components regarding how the identified issue impacts healthcare access, cost, and/or collaboration with other disciplines.
|
15 pts
Developing
Developing discussion of how the identified issue impacts healthcare access, cost, and collaboration with other disciplines. OR Effective discussion of one of the three components regarding how the identified issue impacts healthcare access, cost, and/or collaboration with other disciplines.
|
0 pts
Unacceptable
No discussion of the impact of healthcare delivery. OR No discussion related to access, cost, or collaboration with other disciplines. OR No assignment submitted.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
|
5 pts
Exceptional
Detailed summary is inclusive of all components of the paper. No introduction of new topics provided.
|
4 pts
Effective
Effective summary with some details of the paper that is inclusive of all components of the paper. No introduction of new topics provided.
|
3 pts
Developing
Underdeveloped summary that is inclusive of all components of the paper. OR At least one component of the paper is not provided in the conclusion. OR New topics are provided in the conclusion.
|
0 pts
Unacceptable
No conclusion provided. OR No assignment submitted.
|
|
5 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Organization
|
10 pts
Exceptional
Excellent grammar, mechanics, and organization with no errors in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of paragraphs; and use of complete sentences. Paper is written in third person point of view and adheres to the page limits provided.
|
8 pts
Effective
Effective grammar, mechanics, and organization with 2-3 errors in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of paragraphs; and use of complete sentences. Paper is written in third person point of view and adheres to the page limits provided.
|
6 pts
Developing
Developing grammar, mechanics, and organization with more than 3 errors in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of paragraphs; and use of complete sentences. OR Paper is not written in third person. OR Paper is significantly under or over the page limits provided.
|
0 pts
Unacceptable
Very poor grammar, mechanics, and organization is present where paper is difficult to understand. OR No Assignment submitted.
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format for Page Setup, In-Text Citations, and References
|
10 pts
Exceptional
APA formatted student paper with 0 to 1 error: • Page set up for title page and general paper (font, page number, and line spacing) are free from errors. • Correct use of formatted level headings is present. • Paper consistently presents APA formatted citations of the references page within the text. • Citations and the references listed on the reference page match. • There is consistent presence of correctly formatted APA in-text citations (paper includes 1 short direct quote in addition to multiple paraphrased sections). • Correct APA formatting on the reference page.
|
8 pts
Effective
APA formatted student paper meets the criteria listed in the first column with 2 to 3 errors.
|
6 pts
Developing
APA formatted student paper meets the criteria listed in the first column with 4 to 7 errors.
|
0 pts
Unacceptable
No APA formatting. OR paper meets the criteria listed in the first column with 8 or more errors. OR no assignment submit
|
|