Swat analysis based on workplace violence against nurses/ especially nurses in the er
January 30, 2024January 30, 2024
Discipline: Nursing
The purpose of the literature review is to utilize peer-reviewed journals to support your SWOT Analysis topic identified in Week 1. Portions of this assignment will be utilized in the final paper.
Assignment Instructions: Literature Review
(3-4 pages)
Conduct a literature review on your identified situation or issue from the SWOT Analysis.
Access the Galen library to obtain your peer-reviewed articles.
The literature review should consist of a minimum of three (3) articles from peer-reviewed journals written within the last 5 years.
What evidence supports your concerns?
How does this situation impact the cost of healthcare delivery?
Paper is to be written in APA format
Additional Assignment Instructions: Below is a list of the 6 sections to include in your assignment submission:
Introduction of the Issue: Provide a discussion of theidentified in the SWOT analysis.
Inclusion of Three Peer-Reviewed Articles: Provide a summary of the three peer-reviewed articles that align with the identified healthcare issue. Ensure to include in-text citations to reference the articles.
Application of the Evidence- Provide a synthesis (compare and contrast the articles) of the three peer-reviewed articles as it pertains to the identified healthcare issue. Ensure to include in-text citations to reference the articles.
Impact on Healthcare Delivery- Provide a discussion on the way in which the identified issue
Conclusion: Provide a discussion that summarizes all components of the paper. The discussion provides conclusive comments that reflect on prior components without introducing new topics.
APA Formatting- The paper is submitted in proper APA format and within the 3-4-page limit.
Rubric
NSG 4310 Literature Review 11.2020
NSG 4310 Literature Review 11.2020
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
5pts
Exceptional
Detailed introduction where the paper clearly identifies a healthcare topic identified in the SWOT Analysis, and a well-developed purpose statement.
4pts
Effective
Acceptable introduction where the paper identifies a healthcare topic in the identified SWOT Analysis. A purpose statement is provided.
3pts
Developing
Underdeveloped introduction where the paper does not clearly identify the healthcare topic in the identified SWOT Analysis. An underdeveloped purpose statement is provided.
0pts
Unacceptable
No introduction was provided. OR Topic selected was not approved by the instructor. OR No assignment submitted.
5pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclusion of Three Peer-Reviewed Articles
30pts
Exceptional
Detailed summaries of the three articles where the paper clearly describes the type of study/design, purpose, sample, methods, and results for each article. In-text citations are provided from each article. All three articles are scholarly, peer-reviewed articles, and dated within 5 years.
26pts
Effective
Effective summaries of the three articles were the paper aptly describes the type of study/design, purpose, sample, methods, and results for each article. In-text citations are provided from each article. All three articles are scholarly, peer-reviewed articles, and dated within 5 years.
18pts
Developing
Underdeveloped summaries of the three articles with minimal article content provided. OR Effective summaries of one to two articles. OR At least one article is not scholarly/peer-reviewed and/or dated within 5 years.
0pts
Unacceptable
No article summaries were provided. OR No assignment submitted.
30pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of the Evidence
20pts
Exceptional
Detailed analysis (compare and contrast) of the three scholarly/peer-reviewed articles. In-text citations are provided for each article.
17pts
Effective
Effective analysis with some analysis (compare and contrast) of the three articles. In-text citations are provided for each article.
15pts
Developing
Underdeveloped analysis (compare and contrast) of the three articles with minimal article content. OR Effective analysis of one to two articles. OR At least one article is not scholarly/peer-reviewed and/or dated within five years.
0pts
Unacceptable
No article analysis was provided. OR No assignment submitted.
20pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact of Healthcare Delivery
20pts
Exceptional
Detailed discussion regarding how the identified issue impacts healthcare access, cost, and collaboration with other disciplines.
17pts
Effective
Effective discussion of 2 of the 3 components regarding how the identified issue impacts healthcare access, cost, and/or collaboration with other disciplines.
15pts
Developing
Developing discussion of how the identified issue impacts healthcare access, cost, and collaboration with other disciplines. OR Effective discussion of one of the three components regarding how the identified issue impacts healthcare access, cost, and/or collaboration with other disciplines.
0pts
Unacceptable
No discussion of the impact of healthcare delivery. OR No discussion related to access, cost, or collaboration with other disciplines. OR No assignment submitted.
20pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
5pts
Exceptional
Detailed summary is inclusive of all components of the paper. No introduction of new topics provided.
4pts
Effective
Effective summary with some details of the paper that is inclusive of all components of the paper. No introduction of new topics provided.
3pts
Developing
Underdeveloped summary that is inclusive of all components of the paper. OR At least one component of the paper is not provided in the conclusion. OR New topics are provided in the conclusion.
0pts
Unacceptable
No conclusion provided. OR No assignment submitted.
5pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Organization
10pts
Exceptional
Excellent grammar, mechanics, and organization with no errors in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of paragraphs; and use of complete sentences. Paper is written in third person point of view and adheres to the page limits provided.
8pts
Effective
Effective grammar, mechanics, and organization with 2-3 errors in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of paragraphs; and use of complete sentences. Paper is written in third person point of view and adheres to the page limits provided.
6pts
Developing
Developing grammar, mechanics, and organization with more than 3 errors in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of paragraphs; and use of complete sentences. OR Paper is not written in third person. OR Paper is significantly under or over the page limits provided.
0pts
Unacceptable
Very poor grammar, mechanics, and organization is present where paper is difficult to understand. OR No Assignment submitted.
10pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format for Page Setup, In-Text Citations, and References
10pts
Exceptional
APA formatted student paper with 0 to 1 error: • Page set up for title page and general paper (font, page number, and line spacing) are free from errors. • Correct use of formatted level headings is present. • Paper consistently presents APA formatted citations of the references page within the text. • Citations and the references listed on the reference page match. • There is consistent presence of correctly formatted APA in-text citations (paper includes 1 short direct quote in addition to multiple paraphrased sections). • Correct APA formatting on the reference page.
8pts
Effective
APA formatted student paper meets the criteria listed in the first column with 2 to 3 errors.
6pts
Developing
APA formatted student paper meets the criteria listed in the first column with 4 to 7 errors.
0pts
Unacceptable
No APA formatting. OR paper meets the criteria listed in the first column with 8 or more errors. OR no assignment submit
Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!
Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.
Choose writer
Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.
Add funds
Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.
Ready
Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.