Hello this is the final assigment with the same content. Is the paper and a Table. I put it together this time. Im going to attach the previous one you did for me. Also at the end I have some reviews from the professor in the table
Unit 6: Scholarship of Application – Evaluation and Outcomes
The paper is to be written in APA (7th ed.) format, including a title page, appropriate use of headings to separate the main sections of the body of the paper, proper in-text citations, and a references page.
The draft needs to include, but is not limited to, the following elements:
- The purpose of the scholarly project, including providing the Aim Statement
- What measure(s) will you use to evaluate the proposed project? Reflect on the types of measures that were reviewed in your week 5 learning resources (structure, process, outcome).
- Having identified the measure(s) that will be utilized to evaluate the project, what data can you utilize in the evaluation process?
- Provide a description of the process for measuring the effect (e.g., observation report, utilization of an anonymous survey, utilization of pre/post implementation survey, chart review, etc.)
This is the continuation of the previous 2 Papers. Can you add my name, the course and Professor to the final paper? Nilmary Medina Centeno, Professor Stephanie Turner. Course NU760
NU760 Unit 6 Assignment Rubric
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
Addresses all components of the assignment.
|
|
30 pts
|
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport and Evidence
Uses evidence to support main tenets, points, or arguments presented in the assignment.
|
|
30 pts
|
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Coherence
Uses a logical progression of ideas and presents a clear articulation of main tenets. Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.
Written coherently, using APA format or another format as required. |
|
25 pts
|
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCumulative Impression
The assignment, as a whole, is scholarly, compelling, and impressive.
|
|
15 pts
|
||||
|
Total Points: 100
|
Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities
As you can see an ethical approach to scholarship begins upon inception of the project through the culmination of the activity and throughout professional practice. The prospectus to be presented to an IRB includes a discussion of the problem topic, PICOT question, literature review section, methodology, results, and recommendations.
The Belmont Report provides guidelines for the ethical selection of research participants, ethical conduct, and informed consent. The three ethical principles addressed are: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.
Institutional Review Board
Depending on the design of a scholarly improvement project, the graduate nurse and/or the project team may be required to submit an application to an IRB for review relative to the protection of human subject.
- Herzing University has its own IRB which meets at regularly scheduled dates throughout the academic year. Read about the Herzing University Institutional Review BoardLinks to an external site..
Reading Resources
Please review the following literature on nursing ethical considerations, ethical conduct, and the Office for Human Research Protections.
- Haddad LM, Geiger RA. Nursing ethical considerationsLinks to an external site.. [Updated 2021 Aug 30]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-.
- Gaines, K. (2022). What is the nursing code of ethicsLinks to an external site.?
- Gelling, L., Ersser, S., Heaslip, V., Tait, D., & Trenoweth, S. (2021). Ethical conduct of nursing researchLinks to an external site.. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30, e69– e71.
- Hunt DF, Dunn M, Harrison G, Bailey, J. (2021). Ethical considerations in quality improvement: key questions and a practical guideLinks to an external site.. BMJ Open Quality 2021;10:e001497. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001497
- Hall, S., Lee, V., & Haase, K. (2020). Exploring the challenges of ethical conduct in quality improvement projectsLinks to an external site..Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 30(1), 64–68.
- Office for Human Research ProtectionsLinks to an external site.
Video Presentations
Unit 6: Synthesis Matrix Table Continuation
Instructions
Now that are moving deeper into the literature surrounding your proposed project, it is imperative for you to stay engaged with review, appraisal, and synthesis activities.
Using the Synthesis Matrix Table you submitted in week 4, update the table with a minimum of an additional 5 resources of evidence. Meaning your updated table will now minimally include 15 resources.
Direct access to the article is essential for grading. Either upload all evidence along with your table or be sure an activated link is provided to ensure it leads directly to the article you are presenting.
NU760 Unit 6 Matrix Assignment Rubric
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
Addresses all components of the assignment.
|
|
30 pts
|
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport and Evidence
Uses evidence to support main tenets, points, or arguments presented in the assignment.
|
|
30 pts
|
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Coherence
Uses a logical progression of ideas and presents a clear articulation of main tenets. Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.
Written coherently, using APA format or another format as required. |
|
25 pts
|
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCumulative Impression
The assignment, as a whole, is scholarly, compelling, and impressive.
|
|
15 pts
|
||||
|
Total Points: 100
|
Notes from Professor in Previous table :Source 6- Link is broken , Source 7- Link takes me to a screen asking me to pay for the article , Source 10- you did not include a purpose.