What is gained by not treating ‘gender’ as a synonym for ‘women’ in global struggles for gender equality?

Please follow theses instructions carefully I want you to reword everything differently some things sound to Ai for me I need it to sound more realistic use real life events other than the ones I included also include one resource outside other than the source I use # Breaking Traditional Paradigms: Gender Equality as a Universal Journey As Finnemore and Sikkink (1998, p.891) powerfully state, “New norms never enter a normative vacuum but instead emerge in a highly contested normative space where they must compete with other norms and perceptions of interest.” This observation perfectly captures the challenge and opportunity we face in broadening our understanding of gender beyond its traditional association with women’s issues. Throughout this semester’s exploration of gender in international politics, we’ve learned that this expansion of understanding is not a single moment of realization but rather a continuous journey of discovery that challenges our preconceptions and enriches our global perspective. # Dismantling Traditional Frameworks During our September 16 discussions, we explored how the conventional equation of gender with women’s issues has historically limited our understanding of global challenges. As one student pointed out during class, “When we only think about gender in terms of women, we miss half the equation.” This insight resonated deeply with Keck and Sikkink’s (1998) analysis of transnational advocacy networks, which demonstrates how broader coalitions achieve more substantial change. Consider the recent global climate movement: when we examine it through a comprehensive gender lens, we see how traditional gender roles affect both women’s vulnerability to climate change and men’s resistance to environmental initiatives due to associations between masculinity and resource extraction industries. This interconnection would be invisible if we only focused on women’s experiences. # Resistance and Evolution in Understanding Our September 23 sessions revealed how limiting gender to women’s issues can paradoxically strengthen opposition to equality initiatives. As Sanders (2018) argues, “The very framing of gender equality as a ‘women’s issue’ provides ammunition to those who seek to undermine it.” During class discussions, we examined how this plays out in contemporary politics, from debates over paternity leave to workplace equality initiatives. A recent example from Nordic countries demonstrates this effectively: when parental leave policies were reframed from “maternity leave” to “family leave,” they gained broader support and led to more equitable outcomes for all parents. This shift in perspective benefited not just women but entire families and communities. # The Intersection of Masculinity and Social Progress Connell’s (2005) work, which we explored in early December, provided a crucial framework for understanding how rigid gender roles constrain everyone’s potential. During our December 2 discussion, we examined how traditional masculinity norms affect everything from mental health access to environmental advocacy. As one class member noted, “It’s not just about giving women more opportunities; it’s about freeing everyone from restrictive gender expectations.” The #MeToo movement offers a powerful example of why this broader understanding matters. While initially focused on women’s experiences, the movement has evolved to address toxic workplace cultures that harm all employees and has sparked crucial conversations about masculinity, power, and consent that benefit everyone. # Health and Human Rights Through a Comprehensive Lens Peacock et al.’s (2009) research on HIV/AIDS, which we discussed in our final weeks, demonstrates how gender norms affect health outcomes universally. In class, we examined how traditional masculine expectations of “toughness” discourage health-seeking behavior, while feminine stereotypes about caregiving can overburden women with unpaid healthcare work. Recent COVID-19 response efforts have shown how gender-aware health initiatives that consider these dynamics are more effective than those that don’t. # Decolonizing Our Understanding Our December 9 examination of “feminist imperialism” challenged us to think critically about how Western frameworks of gender equality might inadvertently perpetuate colonial power dynamics. As Winter et al. (2002) argue, “The assumption that gender equality means the same thing everywhere reflects a dangerous oversimplification.” This insight has particular relevance for international development work, where local understandings of gender often differ significantly from Western paradigms. # Moving Forward: A Continuous Learning Journey As you thoughtfully noted in class, this journey of understanding gender beyond women’s issues is ongoing and requires constant reflection. The recent global movements for racial justice have shown how gender intersects with other forms of identity and oppression in ways that demand more nuanced analysis. Korolczuk and Graff’s (2018) observation that “gender has become a symbolic glue for various forms of resistance to social progress” helps us understand why expanding our understanding of gender is both challenging and essential. When we recognize gender as a universal concern rather than a women’s issue, we create space for more inclusive and effective solutions to global challenges. # Conclusion The gains from not treating gender as synonymous with women extend far beyond academic understanding. As we’ve learned throughout this semester, this broader perspective enables more effective policy-making, more inclusive social movements, and more sustainable solutions to global challenges. Your reflection about still learning and questioning demonstrates the exact mindset needed to continue breaking down traditional paradigms and building more equitable systems. As one particularly insightful comment from our final class discussion noted, “Breaking free from seeing gender as just about women is like putting on 3D glasses – suddenly you see depth and complexity that was always there but invisible before.” This ongoing process of learning and unlearning continues to reveal new possibilities for creating positive change in our increasingly interconnected world.
# References Baldez, L. (2014). Defying Convention: US Resistance to the UN Treaty on Women’s Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press. Connell, R. W. (2005). Change among the Gatekeepers: Men, Masculinities, and Gender Equality in the Global Arena. Signs, 30(3), 1801-1825. Corredor, E. S. (2019). Unpacking ‘Gender Ideology’ and the Global Right’s Antigender Countermovement. Signs, 44(3), 613-638. Davis, K. (2002). Feminist Body/Politics as World Traveller: Translating Our Bodies, Ourselves. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 9(3), 223-247. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Korolczuk, E., & Graff, A. (2018). Gender as ‘Ebola from Brussels’: The Anticolonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism. Signs, 43(4), 797-821. Peacock, D., Stemple, L., Sawires, S., & Coates, T. J. (2009). Men, HIV/AIDS, and Human Rights. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 51(Supplement 3), 119-125. Pease, B. (2008). Engaging Men in Men’s Violence Prevention: Exploring the Tensions, Dilemmas and Possibilities. Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse, Issues Paper 17. Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction. In T. Risse, S. C. Ropp, & K. Sikkink (Eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (pp. 1-38). New York: Cambridge University Press. Russo, A. (2006). The Feminist Majority Foundation’s Campaign to Stop Gender Apartheid: The Intersections of Feminism and Imperialism in the United States. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(4), 557-580. Sanders, R. (2018). Norm Spoiling: Undermining the International Women’s Rights Agenda. International Affairs, 94(2), 271-291. Winter, B., Thompson, D., & Jeffreys, S. (2002). The UN Approach to Harmful Traditional Practices. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 4(1), 72-94.
Please follow the feedback of how it should properly be done