THE ASSIGNMENT SHOULD BE ANSWERED BY DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS FROM AUTHORS!!!!!
I want around 3-4 different viewpoints from different scholars/authors that answer the question but have different viewpoints and arguments.
so for each argument/ theme that a group of authors argue, I want it in a separate paragraph.
within one argument, at least 5 authors arguing the same thing should be included for each paragraph
authors can have a different view of how the history has happened and different reasoning to why those intervening have cooperated or not cooperated to the intervention.
Also what these actors who are intervening in the Sudan conflict are trying to get out of it.
checklist
– in-depth paragraphs with a chain of analysis, EVIDENCE
– ILLUSTRATIVE CASES TO BE INCLUDED
– link to international theories
– link to the Libya, Rwanda and Somalia interventions for comparison when making an argument
MUST BE SCHOLARLY WORK
REFERENCING – SOME REFERENCING SHOULD HAVE QUOTES WITH PAGE NUMBERS
USE THE READINGS ATTACHED AS WELL AS FIND MORE :
Harry Verhoeven, Lydiah Kemunto Bosire & Sharath Srinivasan (2009) Understanding Sudan’s Saviors and Survivors: Darfur in the Crossfire between Humanitarian Fundamentalism and Khartoum’s Divide and Rule, Review of African Political Economy, 36:122, 630-635, DOI: 10.1080/03056240903346244 (including the Mamdani reprint provided as context for the piece)
· Roland Paris, ‘The “Responsibility to Protect” and the Structural Problems of Preventive Humanitarian Intervention’, International Peacekeeping, Vol.21, No.5, 2014, pp.569–603. (This article, largely in the context of the first ‘use’ of R2P, in Libya, provoked a useful debate. There are four short responses to the article, and a reply from Paris listed in the further readings).
Ramesh Thakur, ‘R2P’s “Structural” Problems: A Response to Roland Paris’, International Peacekeeping, Vol.22, No.1, 2015, pp.11–25;
· Robert Pape, ‘Response to Roland Paris Article’, International Peacekeeping, Vol.22, No.1, 2015, pp.9–10;
· David Mutimer, ‘Whose Problems Are These Anyway? A Response to Roland Paris’, International Peacekeeping, Vol.22, No.1, 2015, pp.6–8;
· David Chandler, ‘The R2P Is Dead, Long Live the R2P: The Successful Separation of Military Intervention from the Responsibility to Protect’, International Peacekeeping, Vol.22, No.1, 2015, pp.1–5.
· Roland Paris (2015) Responsibility to Protect: The Debate Continues, International Peacekeeping, 22:2, 143-150, DOI: 10.1080/13533312.2015.1017079
Vik, C. (2015). Moral Responsibility, Statecraft and Humanitarian Intervention. London: Routledge.
Sudan:
· Mahmood Mamdani, Who is to Blame in South Sudan, Boston Review, June 28 2016. http://bostonreview.net/world/mahmood-mamdani-south-sudan-failed-transition
· Mahmood Mamdani, ‘Responsibility to Protect or Right to Punish?’ Chapter in ‘Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics and the War on Terror’. 271-300. Doubleday, 2009.
· G. M. Sørbø, ‘Local Violence and International Intervention in Sudan’, Review of African Political Economy 37, no. 124, 2010, pp. 173–186.
· Maria Gabrielsen Jumbert, ‘How Sudan’s ‘rogue’ state label shaped US responses to the Darfur conflict: what’s the problem and who’s in charge?, Third World Quarterly, 35(2), 2014, pp. 284–299
· D. Johnson, Root Causes of Sudan’s Civil Wars, B loomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2003
· J. Leach, War and Politics in Sudan, I.B. Taurus & Co., 2011
· Srinivasan, Sharath. Negotiating violence: Sudan’s peacemakers and the war in Darfur. African Affairs. 2014. 113, 450, 24-44
· Murithi, Tim. ‘The African Union’s evolving role in peace operations: the African Union Mission in Burundi, The African Union Mission in Sudan and the African Union Mission in Somalia: essays’. African Security Review. 17, 1, 70-82, Jan. 1, 2008. ISSN: 10246029.
· Akuffo, EA. Cooperating for peace and security or competing for legitimacy in Africa? : the case of the African Union in Darfur. African Security Review. 19, 4, 74-89, Jan. 1, 2010. ISSN: 10246029.